-5

After seeing how someone used Seedance 2.0 to improve a famously bad anime scene (check the post here), it got me thinking: if in the near future you can just feed a rough storyboard or even a CBR file to an AI and get a fully animated episode, what's the point of the traditional animation pipeline?

Either the industry adopts these tools en masse, or we'll have a situation where the "fan-made" AI version of a show drops online before the official one is even finished. And if studios do use AI, how will the final product be any different from the countless fan remasters flooding the web? Feels like the whole definition of "official" animation is about to get very blurry.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Tabitha@hexbear.net 1 points 6 hours ago

about the link specifically... I couldn't identify what was wrong with the original version? Because I can think a lot of famously badly animated scenes, and the only problem I could see with the original scene is that they just stand around talking and doing nothing.

The AI version, while I did identify that a small number of shots were objectively better, I also noticed characters being replaced with a completely different art style and other random changes that imply a different authoral intent.

Also, the commenters in the thread did not seem to agree the new one was better. As tech experiment it's not a bad comparison, but in terms of ways to blow $50, OP wasted their money, when literally anyone could tell you 5 anime scenes they wished were drawn better.

I think slop studios will use this for 90% of animations soon, and higher end studios might use future iteration of this to boost to 60fps and/or reduce the number of keyframes drawn by hand, which could in theory lead to a higher quality output at the same-or-reduced cost (with the same amount of labor, or in less time).

[-] Ryoae@piefed.social 2 points 8 hours ago

Given by how repulsed animators like Miyazaki was when AI was able to replicate Studio Ghibli's style, there may be some resistances in getting AI implemented into anime shows and movies. CGI already was barely accepted and you'll find watchers who just don't even like CGI being implemented.

[-] Asafum@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I think animators will get screwed, but the corporate structures that own IPs will get even wealthier as they can just hire a very small handful of people to come up with a story and then pump out animations "instantly."

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago

And then the shape of the industry itself will change. They might start developing massive numbers of IPs in parallel to find the most popular ones, for example.

If the stories themselves can be AI generated, the Black Mirror thing where they're made up on demand for a specific person might happen.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

Studios definitely will use AI if it works. Animators are expensive.

check the post here

I can't think of a worse example for the utility of using AI to improve animation than some slice of life bullshit. This just looked like someone wasted their time (or would have, if they were doing actual work) remaking scenes with equivalent quality animation. Honestly idk what's even "famously bad" about the original

[-] HobbitFoot 3 points 1 day ago

I feel like it's a continuation of what we've already seen with digital animation. You can do traditional ink animation, but no one does it any more because digital is so much cheaper.

[-] gilindoeslemmy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I don’t think so. I think it will enable more people with good ideas to create stuff.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Okay, sure, but if your job is mostly drawing and not inventing...

this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
-5 points (40.0% liked)

Asklemmy

53279 readers
333 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS