212
Kick Hungary out of the EU?
That's the right call, and if there isn't a way to vote them out then make one.
It is not the right call. That cedes ground to Russian influence.
The right course of action is to fight back the russian covert ops, expose orban as grossly incompetent and corrupt, and get him replaced with someone who's actually good for Hungary.
Sadly there is no mechanism for this
Lock the Kremlin stooge in the bathroom and vote a mechanism into place. Only let them out when it's done so they can pack their shit and leave.
Article 50 would be the way if i recall correctly?
That would be if Hungary chooses to leave. There isn't a way for other members to kick out a member against their will
It wouldn't be much of a protection pact if the more powerful countries could just remove the smaller ones at will
I mean… you can’t kick them out… but you can make remaining in the union while maintaining such obstinacy so onerous and unbearable that they themselves invoke A50. This would of course be a tactic to use if Orban somehow manages to maintain his grasp on power in the upcoming election. But it should be noted as an option.
Well then you need an article that reads something along the lines of:
"Should a member state of the EU repeatedly and consistently act in the interests of states that are outside of the EU, or against the common interest of the defense of the EU, the remaining member states may invoke Article [whatever number is next}, and may hold a vote to expel the hostile member state. The vote needs a 90+ to 95+ % of the representatives to vote in the affirmative, but at that time EU membership and all security clearances are immediately revoked."
It's also a toothless defense pact if one hostile actor can undermine the defense of every other country in, and surrounding, the EU.
But the other countries could leave and reform under a new treaty could they not?
Look, by the time you're resorting to asking about dissolving and reconstituting the EU as a mechanism, I'm going to boldly suggest that you aren't going to find anything the army of career civil servants navigating this crisis first-hand haven't already considered.
Edit: Just saying, though, that we could go with The Onion's idea.
Wouldn't it be possible under article 7, I imagine that the rest of the EU is just waiting to see if orban gets ousted in the next election and if he stays then pursue this avenue.
Italy and Slovakia will defend Orban, unfortunately. Hungary/The Kremlin aren't working in isolation within the EU.
I want to believe there are a lot of people in Hungary who oppose Orban. Maybe the majority at this stage. Kicking them out would be devastating for their hope of better days.
The EU needs better mechanisms to contain bad faith members. It can already restrict funds. They need a mechanism to pass over one member's veto.
Oh for sure I would hate to have the people suffering because of their idiot leader. And yes ideally there should be a mechanism to counter one person from fucking everything up.
Kick the trojan horse.
Remove hungary
Then they're being anti-strategic morons:
Orban is Putin's ally, NOT EU's.
Appeasement won't allow the EU to be viable, once Trump has ripped civilrights from the Americas, & the EU has NOBODY helping it, against China-backed Putin.
No matter: the souls who WON'T learn, this world, .. whenever they accept that their opportunity's finally gone ( like millenia in the future, after not having human-category-lives to inhabit because we wouldn't do what we had to do, to survive )..
they'll find some other world, & ..
.. do exactly the same won't-grow-up there, too.
Only a tiny-percentage of souls grow-up, on each world, it looks like, & that means that no significant fraction of humankind will grow-up in time, here.
So, a species-wide DarwinAward will be our epitaph, later this century.
At-least inertia/won't-grow-up gets to be honored as being our most-important "god"..
That must mean something..
/s
< bitterness >
"We will deliver on our word one way or the other," von der Leyen told reporters. "Let me be clear. We have different options and we will use them."
I don't think appeasement is the strategy, why would you think that?
The results-at-the-time indicated that the EU couldn't deliver.
I was accepting that evidence/result as valid.
Politicians saying things which contradict their-actions don't convince me, anymore.
I'm old.
_ /\ _
Where there's a will there's a way, as they say.
And the will was very strong in EU, the only reason EU didn't force it through sooner, was because we want to have good relations with the new government of Hungary, if the Hungarian people should decide to throw out Orban, which they luckily did.
I was 100% confident that EU would find a way around Orban if necessary. It is of enormous importance and high priority to Europe that we help Ukraine win this war.
But to be fair, I'm from Denmark, and we are the strongest supporters of Ukraine in the world. So I'm biased too, but I know it, and I try to be careful not to base my expectations too much on it.
We are also the country in EU with the least confidence in USA now, in part because of Greenland, but AFAIK we were already before that.
Politicians saying things which contradict their-actions don’t convince me, anymore.
USA is near irrelevant politically to us now.
When EU politicians sweet talk Trump, the agenda is quite different. But I guess you figured that out too, when looking at the actions of EU.
this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2026
212 points (98.2% liked)
World News
56221 readers
2833 users here now
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS