-3
I swear by god (lemmy.ml)
submitted 4 days ago by zeioth@lemmy.ml to c/amd@lemmy.ml

If I discover you AMD are delaying multi frame generation on purpose to pull something like you did with FSR4 on RDNA5, you won't see a single penny from me as long as I live.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Amd is a corporation, not your friend. Expect them to do what makes them the most money. If being nice makes them more then they’ll be nice. But they’ve proven over the last few generations they’ll happily be Nvidia - 10%.

[-] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 days ago
[-] vikingtons@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

fsr 4's algo was enabled on rdna 4 via hardware changes. people will argue that it works on rdna 2 & 3 via a leaked int8 path, often leaving out that:

  • it's not identical in terms of visual quality (even though it does often improve upon 3.X)
  • most critically, it doesn't generally offer the same level of perf uplift to make it worthwhile (though there are a handful of very good cases)

I suppose I'm kind of opinionated about the whole upscaling and mfg 'meta' of (mostly) pc gaming today, but I find it sad that this is what end users clamour for, rather than for games to just not run like shit to begin with.

this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
-3 points (36.4% liked)

AMD

2115 readers
1 users here now

AMD news, hardware reviews and analysis and discussions

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS