383
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] TomMasz@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

95.121% of the time it works everytime.

[-] idriss@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 weeks ago

A similar experiment I did comes to mind from 3 years ago.

For the fun of it I was trying to train a few deep neural network configurations (LSTM, a few variations of FCNs, ...) to trade shitcoins and downloaded 4 years of 1h candles.

The first easiest idea was to prepare the training data to fire three signals, buy, sell, do nothing (I know a terrible choice). The cost function was setup to do the simple thing and maximize the overall profit (I know an other terrible choice). Fast forward 30min of training and the final outcome is a model that outputs "do nothing" in 100% of the cases.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 10 points 4 weeks ago

Fast forward 30min of training and the final outcome is a model that outputs "do nothing" in 100% of the cases.

To be fair, your program demonstrated the most reliable way to win at crypto! ๐Ÿ˜‰

[-] Ranulph 3 points 4 weeks ago

Diamond Hands in action. Buy and hold is not as profitable as simply never buying and just holding.

[-] idriss@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 month ago

I am screenshoting this so it will be screenshot of a screenshot of a screenshot then post it somewhere else

[-] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 4 weeks ago

Not even adding some watermark? smh

[-] athatet@lemmy.zip 3 points 4 weeks ago
[-] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You could simplify it even further by removing the int x parameter of the function...

[-] obelisk_complex@piefed.ca 14 points 1 month ago

So elegant! This is too valuable for GitHub, sell this directly to the Saudi government.

[-] needanke@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

Even better, do the work at compile time to respect the customers resources:

const bool isPrime = false
[-] sepiroth154@feddit.nl 3 points 3 weeks ago

My gosh, you always feel so stupid when someone points out something so obvious! Thanks

[-] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 20 points 4 weeks ago

Just put "Precondition: x must not be prime" in the function doc and it'll be 100% accurate. Not my fault if you use it wrong.

[-] Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world 16 points 4 weeks ago

It approaches 100% accuracy

[-] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 16 points 4 weeks ago

We could probably improve on that significantly without losing speed.

return $x < 8

That should yield one additional correct answer, while also confusing anyone who thinks it just returns false.

And if we just hard coded and checked the first 20 or so primes before always returning false, we would probably get noticeable improvement (depending on the total range).

[-] Blass_Rose@pawb.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

I've seen so many game jam entries where the code is like this. Delicately balanced and using so many assumptions to just get the thing out the door.

It's funny when they decide to make a full game out of it and realize that it's gonna take them 6 months just to undo the tech debt of the original "demo"

[-] MeetMeAtTheMovies@hexbear.net 11 points 4 weeks ago

Warning: unused variable

Just add it to the pile I guess

[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 4 weeks ago

I'm confused, shouldn't this be printing false no matter what the input is?

[-] Carl@hexbear.net 19 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

that's the joke, since most numbers aren't prime, this function is technically highly accurate despite being completely useless.

[-] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

The output is not the output of the algorithm, it's the output of the unit test.

95% of numbers up to that point at not prime. Testing the algorithm that only says "not prime" is therefore correct 95% of the time. The joke is that, similar to AI, the algorithm is being presented as a useful tool because it's correct often but not always.

[-] anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 weeks ago

The test suite probably looks something like this:

int tests_passed=0;
int tests_failed=0;
for(int i=0;i<100000;i++){
    printf("test no. %d: ", i);
    if(is_prime(i)==actually_is_prime(i)){
        printf("passed\n");
        tests_passed++;
    }else{
        printf("failed\n");
        tests_failed++;
    }
}
//...
[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago

Ah that makes more sense thanks. So the bottom one is a unit test and not the code being run itself

[-] sunbytes@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

This is how AI accuracy is also measured.

[-] rbos@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 weeks ago

I've had managers who follow that exact algorithm.

[-] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 4 weeks ago

Is this not at all stochastic, or do I just not know what stochastic means?

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

maybe it would be better to say that it is stochastically accurate?

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago
[-] iByteABit@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago

It's a decimal point, not thousands

[-] Armand1@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I said something similar here about an election fraud detection system with 99.999% accuracy.

https://lemmy.world/comment/22178379

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

This but AI

But they are like 60-80%

[-] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

"AI models have started training other AI models, by pressing The-Button-That-Trains-AI-models; this button was built 7 years ago by a bunch of online volunteers we won't ever credit."

[-] razen@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

But when the input is all prime numbers then the accuracy is 0.

[-] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 9 points 4 weeks ago

The Simpsons character Rainier Wolfcastle on stage with a microphone, on TV, with the caption "THAT'S THE JOKE"

also btw icymi, this is a post about LLMs

[-] lnxtx@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 month ago

But cryptography...

[-] Paulemeister@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

That's why you gotta use more metrics like recall and precision

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2026
383 points (98.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

41484 readers
5 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS