Basically because we as individuals can't compete with corporations, so when there are large corporate clients they will drive the price up for individuals. It's not guaranteed to happen, but these types of business to business contracts are usually not a good sign for us.

A guy went to adobe.com and told the truth. This is what happened to his organs.

The dimentia took hold for a second.

Probably because it's prioritising what it thinks you're more likely to click on more than the actual search term. AI recommendations basically.

I see capitalism similarly to the way I see conventional grass lawns.

If it's this much work to keep what's supposed to be a "natural human system" or "a part of nature in your yard" working the way it's supposed to then maybe it's not actually what "nature" optimises for.

One solution is to just let the wild plants grow without fucking doing anything if you want nature. IDK for which problem though.

Animals run on instinct and are not capable of anything close to this kind of stuff. This level of cruelty is only possible with humans and any attempt to equate the perpetrators with animals in Western discourse is an attempt by humans not doing shit about the horrors our fellow humans are committing to feel better about themselves by insinuating that the people committing atrocities are somehow "not" human like us.

Don't get me wrong, animals are fucking brutal to each other, but they are not cruel for the sake of being cruel. Unduely cruel animals are selected out of the gene pool. A predator that constantly hunts for sport will wipe out their prey and go extinct. Individuals that waste energy torturing their prey for their own enjoyment will be out competed by members of their own species that simply do what they need to survive. Animals actually have mechanisms to prevent excessive cruelty in an overwhelmingly cruel existence, meanwhile we actively encourage and send resources to support cruelty and allow it to expand. This is a choice, not nature. We have the unique ability to build a safe, thrivable world for every member of our species through our technology. We choose not to.

It would be like giving credence to the concept of “anti-aryanism” in the context of the holocaust.

Which, should be noted, was absolutely a Nazi talking point. Literally "the Jews want Aryans dead so we have to kill them first."

Capitalism model of housing is working great over here 👍

Small loan of 80 billion dollars

Surely it would be English speakers if anything.

People say quantum computing is a grift?

The other two are are only "grifts" because capitalism has shoved them into things that have no business involving them and breeds opportunistic get rich quick mindsets around the technologies. So any time you hear them mentioned it's more than likely to be a grift. They are fine in certain niches and very stupid everywhere else, like every other technology.

China: "Wow they're a lot less tough than we thought"