490
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

A related bit of depression: https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article-abstract/133/4/e835/32713/Effective-Messages-in-Vaccine-Promotion-A

tl;dr: you can't convince anti-vaxxers that their opinions are based on quackery, and trying to do so only deepens their delusion. Also, fuck Andrew Wakefield, he tortured autistic kids and caused irreversible damage to public health for money, I hope he gets set on fire.

"One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back."

  • Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
[-] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jesus this is really bleak. And I have to imagine it's a similar case for various other manufactured conspiracies regarding other scientific topics, elections, LGBTQ+ people, etc. I genuinely don't know how we recover when a third of our population is willfully and militantly misinformed.

From the study:

RESULTS:

None of the interventions increased parental intent to vaccinate a future child. Refuting claims of an MMR/autism link successfully reduced misperceptions that vaccines cause autism but nonetheless decreased intent to vaccinate among parents who had the least favorable vaccine attitudes. In addition, images of sick children increased expressed belief in a vaccine/autism link and a dramatic narrative about an infant in danger increased self-reported belief in serious vaccine side effects.

CONCLUSIONS:

Current public health communications about vaccines may not be effective. For some parents, they may actually increase misperceptions or reduce vaccination intention. Attempts to increase concerns about communicable diseases or correct false claims about vaccines may be especially likely to be counterproductive. More study of pro-vaccine messaging is needed.

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

The author, Brendan Nyhan, is a political scientist. He's published many similar papers about misinformation, scandals, fake news, and politics in journalism and social media. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=SbAA1v4AAAAJ&hl=en

[-] cRazi_man@europe.pub 33 points 1 day ago

This is such a rare skill it is really commendable when I come across someone like this.

[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I don't know how commendable it is.

Sure, we're not changing anyone's minds, but perhaps we can shame them hard enough for their moronic views that they think twice before they open their mouth next time.

How much success have you had with that approach?

[-] Signtist@bookwyr.me 18 points 1 day ago

You can't in one conversation, but if everyone they knew joined in, it would. Ultimately, it's about whether or not they're getting it from all angles. If there's a group they can fall back on that allows them to hold their current beliefs, they'll do that, but the smaller that group is, the more likely they are to change their opinion. People don't often hold opinions that go against the opinions of literally everyone they know.

Sure, it's unlikely that any of these conversations would actually realize that slim chance of making a difference, since just about everyone has someone that lets them voice even their most heinous opinions unchallenged, but I choose not to be a part of that group for anyone, regardless of how much time and effort it costs me. It's not something you do for them, it's something you do for you.

[-] mayabuttreeks@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Oh look, it's a picture of me at every family gathering.

this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
490 points (100.0% liked)

196

5704 readers
2587 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS