461
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 90 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
  • Highly approve as a long-time Wikipedia editor, though I wish they'd write it without LLM generation.
  • "Jiki" sounds like an ethnic slur, and I have no idea why.

Edit: I take it back.

The Jmail X account said that they’ll be implementing the ability for users to report inaccuracies and request changes soon.

That's not what a Wiki is. Although I guess they're not technically claiming to be one; they're a Jiki.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Now that's good jiki!

Those damn dirty jikis. They're ruining pedophilia for all of us!

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Here's the link for the lazy: https://jmail.world/wiki

I tried the AI search by the way and it sucked. The ONE thing AI could do spectacularly well is to search through vast troves of documents for relevant terms.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 21 points 1 day ago

I think you're thinking of a search engine, AIs are bad at searching. They just make up a response related to the search term based on their training data.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 day ago

AI systems designed for searching normally use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrieval-augmented_generation afaik, which involves directly referencing documents rather than guessing based on initial training data.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Wouldn’t you just train them on the documents to be searched?

[-] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 8 points 1 day ago

You get a lot fewer hallucinations if it’s presenting data from sources rather than from its neural network alone. Training data isn’t, like, “in” the AI. It’s just used to shape its creation.

[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

Normally no, because that is much more difficult, resource intensive, and harder to get reliable results than separately looking up the information and including it in the prompt.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And if you train them on the document trove, they will be able to answer questions about it. It is a straight up trivial task.

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 10 points 1 day ago

Make up answers about it. The answers might be right, or they might be wrong, you won't know unless you read the actual data. So helpful ..

[-] senseamidmadness@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 day ago

For an LLM, yes. Search AI is different.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 0 points 1 day ago

"Give me the line numbers corresponding to the saudi sheik saying he liked the torture videos"

Are you trying to be obstinate on purpose?

[-] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 7 points 1 day ago

I don't think I'm trying to be obstinate, I just am.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

A natural! Mazel tov!

[-] roofuskit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

If we are talking about LLMs, the other commenter is entirely right about how they function. But I'm not sure you two are talking about the same technology.

[-] tomiant@piefed.social -2 points 1 day ago

Can an LLM provide me the information I want given a search term if trained on the given dataset? Yes. That is all.

[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

It can provide you some information that looks similar to what you'd want. Whether it is correct is another question.

RAG can help to a degree but hallucinations still happen quite a bit.

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 20 points 1 day ago

Someone should put together a deck of cards and sell them. Kinda like what they had in Iraq.

[-] foxwolf@pawb.social 7 points 1 day ago

Some guy on tiktok tried that with billionaires and every major entity he had to go through to be able to produce the cards and sell them treated him like a domestic terrorist and shut him down

[-] Tinidril@midwest.social 5 points 1 day ago

I bet some Chinese manufacturers wouldn't object.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago

I dunno why but the head-catching basket is kinda cute. Like it could have been a wooden or metal box but it's this dainty looking woven basket. Love it.

[-] Gork@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 day ago

Oddly, there's no jikipedia article on Jeffrey Epstein himself yet.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
461 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

6120 readers
397 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS