139

It always feels like some form of VR tech comes out with some sort of fanfare and with a promise it will take over the world, but it never does.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Encryption with safe, unexploitable backdoors.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] ada@piefed.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 week ago

OTPs have a safe, unexploitable backdoor feature?

[-] tal@lemmy.today 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh, nice catch, thanks. I read it as "safe, without exploitable backdoors", but that's not what he was saying.

[-] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago

I read it the exact same. Didn't notice until reading this, that that is not what was said

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ash@piefed.social 63 points 1 week ago

So I have a contentious one. Quantum computers. (I am actually a physicist, and specialised in qunatum back in uni days, but now work mainly in in medical and nuclear physics.)
Most of the "working": quantum computers are experiments where the outcome has already been decided and the factoring they do can be performed on 8 bit computers or even a dog.
https://eprint.iacr.org/2025/1237.pdf "Replication of Quantum Factorisation Records with an
8-bit Home Computer, an Abacus, and a Dog"
This paper is a hilarious explanation of the tricks being pulled to get published. But then again, it is a nascent technology, and like fusion, I believe it will one day be a world changing technology, but in it's current state is a failure on account of the bullshittery being published. Then again such publications are still useful in the grand scheme of developing the technology, hence why the article I cited is good humoured but still making the point that we need to improve our standards. Plus who doesnt like it when an article includes dogs.
Anyway, my point is, some technologies will be constant failures, but that doesn't mean we should stop.
A cure for cancer is a perfect example. Research has been going on for a century and cumulatively amassed 100s of billions of dollars of funding. It has failed constantly to find a cure, but our understanding of the disease, treatment, how to conduct research, and prevention have all massively increased.

[-] _cnt0@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

A cure for cancer is a perfect example. Research has been going on for a century and cumulatively amassed 100s of billions of dollars of funding. It has failed constantly to find a cure, but our understanding of the disease, treatment, how to conduct research, and prevention have all massively increased.

Cancer != cancer. There are hundreds of types of cancer. Many types meant certain death 50 years ago and can be treated and cured now with high reliability. "The" cure for cancer likely doesn't exist because "the" cancer is not a singular thing, but a categorization for a type of diseases.

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

Exactly, a "cure for cancer" is like "stopping accidents".

There's still cancer, and there are still accidents. But on both fields it's much better to be alive in 2026 than in 1926

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Ediacarium@feddit.org 16 points 1 week ago

They didn't thank Scribble (the dog) in their acknowledgements section. 1/10 paper, would only look at the contained dog picture

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 1 week ago

"Smart" TVs. Somehow they have replaced normal televisions despite being barely usable, laggy, DRM infested garbage.

[-] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 week ago

They are surveilance- and ad delivery platorms. The user experience is as bad as the consumer can tolerate. They work as intended.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 9 points 1 week ago

You're not kidding. It's pretty difficult to not buy them.

It's a $250 smart TV vs a $2000 non-infested TV.

[-] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

Nothing is smart if you dont connect it to the internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 42 points 1 week ago
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 week ago

The big one would be viable nuclear fusion, we've been trying to figure it out and spending money on it for like 80 years now.

That being said, there's actually a lot of verified progress on it lately by reputable organizations and international teams.

[-] actionjbone@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 week ago

It's only 30 years away!

Just like it was 30 years ago.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] early_riser@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago

I'm going to get downvoted for this

Open source has its place, but the FOSS community needs to wake up to the fact that documentation, UX, ergonomics, and (especially) accessibility aren't just nice-to-haves. Every year has been "The Year of the Linux Desktop™" but it never takes off, and it never will until more people who aren't developers get involved.

[-] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not here to downvote. But I will say there is some good changes as of the past five years.

From a personal perspective: there's a lot of GOOD open-source software that has great user experiences. VLC. Bitwarden. OBS. Joplin. Jitsi.

Even WordPress (the new Blocks editor not the ugly classic stuff) in the past decade has a lot of thought and design for end users.

For all the GIMP/Libre office software that just has backwards ass choices for UX, or those random terminal apps that require understanding the command line -- they seem to be the ones everyone complains about and imprinted as "the face of open-source". Which is a shame.

There's so much good open-source projects that really do focus on the casual non technical end user.

[-] lucullus@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 week ago

While you generally have a point, the year of the linux desktop is not hindered by that. Distributions like Linux Mint, Ubuntu and the like are just as easy to install as Windows, the desktop environments preinstalled on them work very good and the software is more than sufficient for like 70% to 80% of people (not counting anything, that you cannot install with a single click from the app store/software center of the distribution.

Though Linux is not the default. Windows is paying big time money to be the default. So why would "normal people" switch? Hell, most people will just stop messaging people instead of installing a different messenger on their phone. Installing a different OS on your PC/Notebook is a way bigger step than that.

So probably we won't get the "Year of the Linux Desktop", unless someone outpays Microsoft for quite some time, or unless microsoft and Windows implode by themselves (not likely either)

[-] itflows@feddit.org 11 points 1 week ago

Funny you make "missing documentation" an argument against open source and for closed source, as if the average Windows user reads any documentation or even the error messages properly.

your comment is a joke.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Printer drivers.

Apparently sending data serially at glacial speeds is impossible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago
[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago

I think there is an open source printer being created. Potentially has the chance at being the only printer that isn't a pile of shit.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Zier@fedia.io 25 points 1 week ago
load more comments (14 replies)
[-] tal@lemmy.today 22 points 1 week ago

Flying cars. The idea has intuitive appeal


just drive like normal, but most congestion problems go away!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_car

We've made them, but the tradeoffs that you have to make to get a good road vehicle that is also a good aircraft are very large. The benefits of having a dual-mode vehicle are comparatively limited. I think that absent some kind of dramatic technological revolution, like, I don't know, making the things out of nanites, we'll just always be better off with dedicated vehicles of the first sort or the second.

Maybe we could have call-on-demand aircraft that could air-ferry ground vehicles, but I think that with something on the order of current technology, that's probably as close as we'll get.

[-] bob_lemon@feddit.org 18 points 1 week ago

Flying cars lose al appeal the moment you encounter other drivers on the road. Just imagine that, but flying.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sugarfoot00@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

Probably not top ten of mind, but Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) has been trotted out by the fossil fuel industry for a generation as a panacea for carbon emissions, in order to prevent any real legislation limiting the combustion of hydrocarbons.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HypergolicRunoff@lemmy.org 20 points 1 week ago

Pesticides.

We came up with this brilliant idea of planting a single crop per field which creates the perfect environment for the things we call "pests". We invented pesticides to kill the pests, which incidentally also kill their predators and competitors, making the environment even more favorable when the pest returns. So we started using more and stronger pesticides, creating a dependency cycle, with the added bonus of poisoning the ground, the water table, the oceans and ourselves.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] JAWNEHBOY@reddthat.com 20 points 1 week ago

Haha I feel like VR has already found it's niche!

Apple taking over an entire car with car play ultra or otherwise comes to mind. Latest Aston Martin model with car play ultra was atrociously laggy, ran instrument panel screen at like 12fps.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 16 points 1 week ago

The shit with VR, specifically, is baffling to me. We have pretty good tech for it and yet nobody seems to know what to actually do with them. Hardware is at a good starting point, but the software is mostly bullshit.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Twitter/X. It is not a free speech platform. Give it up and move on to something else. Stop supporting these billionaires and stop giving them your time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 week ago
[-] gabelstapler@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago

Please don't mix AI with LLMs. LLMs are surely overhyped and I guess they will never reach the quality they promise. AI on the other hand is used in many aspects, successfully. For many years protein folding was extremely difficult. Google threw AI at it, now it can be regarded as a solved problem.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I'll go against the grain and say literally all of it. Every piece of technology that exists is a compromise between what the designer wants to do and the constraints of what is practical or possible to actually pull off. Therefore, all technology "fails" on at least some metric the designer would like it to achieve. Technology is all about improvement and working with imperfection. If we don't keep trying to make things better, then innovation stops. With your example of VR, I'd say that after having seen multiple versions of VR in my lifetime, the one that we have now is way more successful and impactful, especially in commercial uses rather than consumer products. Engineers can now tour facilities before they are built with VR headsets to see design flaws that they might not have seen just with a traditional model review, for example. Furthermore, what we have now is just an iteration on what we had before. It doesn't happen in a vacuum, people take what came before, look at what worked and what didn't, and what could be fixed with other technologies that have developed in the meantime. That's the iteration process.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

AI, Mass Surveillance and privatization of services people need to live and National security technology

[-] timestatic@feddit.org 12 points 1 week ago

Maybe like super-thin phones and foldables/rollable phones. Most people have no need or use for them tbh

[-] early_riser@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

I don't want a phone so thin and slippery I can't hold it in my hand. I want a phone as thicc as an old gray brick Game Boy. When I drop it on the floor I want to have to replace the floor. I want a battery that will outlast the lifespan of the sun.

[-] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DarkShaggy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Cinema movies in 3D with the stupid glasses.

[-] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 11 points 1 week ago

cars.

we're in too deep now, investment bias prevents changing strategy

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip 10 points 1 week ago

Ground-rolling cars as mass transportation. The engineering superb, but the technology inherently can't scale. The storage requirements alone push many cities past the limits financial sustainability, and the spatial requirements for operation lead to massive network congestion as a matter of course. And yet, we keep throwing good money after bad trying to make the system work.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago

Tablets have had a couple of "waves". They've never really gone away, but also haven't really become the norm, either, not in the larger-than-a-current-smartphone sense.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tablet_computer#Early_tablets

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 07 Feb 2026
139 points (97.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

37880 readers
1393 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS