424
submitted 3 months ago by Luniio@lemmy.world to c/buyeuropean@feddit.uk
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 3 months ago

When will it support GrapheneOS? I'm going to keep using last-gen used Pixels until another company comes up with an alternative.

[-] NGram@piefed.ca 60 points 3 months ago

GrapheneOS has some very strict requirements which basically means they will refuse to support anything except Pixel phones. Fairphone isn't in the business of making their own (security) chips so I doubt the Graphene team will ever consider them.

CalyxOS, arguably the next best thing, did have support for earlier Fairphones but that project is sort of in limbo now.

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 70 points 3 months ago

The Graphene team has also been very outspoken about how much they dislike Fairphone for this very reason.

I use /e/OS on my Fairphone 5. It's not a Graphene alternative as it's not a hardened OS, it's just Android without Google. Good enough for me, I'm not afraid of secret agents stealing my phone to extract data or whatever, I just don't want American big tech anywhere near my phone.

[-] 73ms@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 months ago

to be fair I don't think they like anything besides Google Pixel.

[-] cabbage@piefed.social 14 points 3 months ago

Yeah, this is true. They just seem to have a specific beef against Fairphone and /e/OS because it's presented as a privacy alternative (due to no big tech tracking), and the Graphene team believes they are the only ones with the security features to ensure true privacy (because of their... hardened malloc?).

[-] vaionko@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 months ago

Last time I heard they were working with someone to produce a phone with the needed features, but hadn't revealed who.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 months ago

Yeah, I ran Calyx for a while - it was... not a great user experience. If I am forced to change at some point, I'll reconsider it. That said, Graphene's trying to move off of the Pixel platform. I just haven't looked to see if there are any updates since that piece of info reached me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 7 points 3 months ago

TPM chips are not a mythical thing that only Google makes.

STM makes the ST33 series of TPM that I would trust a hell of a lot more than google to not have a dozen government backdoors.

Microchip, Analog Devices, Infineon, NXP, and onsemi also make TPM chips of varying security levels. Infineon is the premium TPM maker with the highest security if I remember right, a German company.

The issue is they are 3-10โ‚ฌ for the chip alone, which is a significant BOM cost, and it takes a lot of very specific knowledge in firmware and software to actually implement and google probably keeps the android integration methods very hidden. It is very much an intentional vendor lock out.

[-] yakko@feddit.uk 6 points 3 months ago

I'm coming at the same desire from the other end, using my fairphone until I can jump ship for graphene.

[-] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago

People want Grapheneos on insecure phones, made by OEMs with a poor history of security patches, with an unlocked bootloader, and root. I personally say those people should use LineageOS because fundamentally that's not GrapheneOS is. The second you water it down from software that can't be hacked by any state actor to just another OS but marginally more secure the name becomes just another brand.

Im gonna be honest I don't see how that would help if anything it would only make things more confusing. That would require the GrapheneOS devs to maintain a separate and significantly less secure OS for what reason?

[-] finalaccountforreal@piefed.social 6 points 3 months ago

I was about to say the same thing!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 34 points 3 months ago

I'm posting with one. I like it so far. waiting for the official lineageOS to be released, I'm running unofficial now.

[-] marius@feddit.org 11 points 3 months ago
[-] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

I'm just really used to lineage, I've used it for years on a lot of phones.

load more comments (1 replies)

Did they already bring back the 3.5mm jack? o.O

[-] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Looks like not, which immediately ruins the phone

[-] 20dogs@feddit.uk 8 points 3 months ago

I don't really see why it's such a dealbreaker for so many. Hardly any phones have 3.5mm, and for those that don't, you can just put a dongle on the end of your existing wired headphones.

[-] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 months ago

Because it's ubiquitous, allows headphones without needing charged, and allows movement around the jack as opposed to the USB c port.

It's a great design and the best part is that if it's included it doesn't preclude anyone from using Bluetooth headphones if they so choose.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Hardly any phones have 3.5mm NOW. Google started this shit, and I do not forgive. I do not forget.

However, there is simply no reason why the manufacturers SHOULDN'T put a second USB port down there, since it would allow for dongle-less use of wired headphones, listening while charging, open up many more niche uses for the hardware, AND it would provide a redundancy for what is, in most cases, the only method of charging and accessing the data on the device

[-] Mihies@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago

*Apple started this shit, Google laughed at them. Initially, that is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Honytawk@feddit.nl 5 points 3 months ago

A USB-C dongle requires you to first insert the dongle and then insert the headphones. Otherwise, the phone doesn't register them.

It is a dealbreaker for me because I hate having to worry about batteries everywhere. I had some in my helmet, and the thing kept interrupting my music because it had to tell me the batteries were low. The entire trip, every damn minute.

Fuck that shit, I already have a battery, it is right in my phone.

And I am not going to spend more than 20โ‚ฌ on headphones either when you can get wired literally for free.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago
[-] BenchpressMuyDebil@szmer.info 4 points 3 months ago

I'm so glad the vote ratio finally caught up to headphone jack jihadists lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AnimalsDream@slrpnk.net 13 points 3 months ago

Phone makers need to understand that a missing headphone jack is a dealbreaker.

Tho it wouldn't be if companies would at least put two usb ports on the devices. I'd be fine using usb wired earbuds as long as I don't have to give my phone one of those dumb splitter tails.

[-] Stitch0815@feddit.org 5 points 3 months ago

is a dealbreaker.

*for you

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] tavostator@feddit.org 10 points 3 months ago

Got mine yesterday!

[-] vga@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I feel like I should start looking at shoulder holsters or other extremely cool accessories when phones are this big. How do you guys carry this shit? Cargo pants?

[-] UnfairUtan@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago
[-] vga@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 months ago

So cargo pants? I tried using a google pixel 9 (the smallest model) and found that I cannot sit down when the phone is in my pocket.

Is my penis too large?

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 months ago

We cant see, can ya post a pic? We're gonna need a banana in the pic for scale.

[-] UnfairUtan@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

My phone is quite large and fits in all my pants pockets. And they're not cargo

Also penis too large bro what ๐Ÿ˜‚

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dudesss@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I would legit pay Fairphone extra at this stage if they would ship to Canada, either at my home or at a pickup location like Staples, Canada Post, or Purolator.

[-] wampus@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Agreed. I'm honestly a bit surprised they haven't moved into the Canadian market. Heck, I heard that their international insurance ppl let you buy them in the USA, home of Google Fascists, but you still can't buy them in Canada, a country that's had a significant trend to decouple from US tech for over a year now.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ
this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
424 points (99.3% liked)

Buy European

10398 readers
319 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS