724
submitted 1 month ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 130 points 1 month ago

There is no way MAGA will accept a Democrat victory in the Midterms, especially if it flips either chamber.

There is no way Trump leaves in 2028.

We ALL already know this in our hearts and our brains. We have to talk about it, and internalize it, and start making contingency plans for those nearly CERTAIN situations.

[-] CallMeButtLove@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There's no way that pants shitting mother fucker makes it to the end of his term. The syphilis will get him before then.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] njm1314@lemmy.world 65 points 1 month ago

This is the line. Let's be honest. That's the red line. If he actually crosses that line you should do things that the World mods will ban me for saying. But that's it. That's the point where any semblance of democracy is totally gone. Where even the most neoliberal Democrat has to know that voting no longer means anything. That's the point where you have to make a choice. That would be the final Point wherein there is a line of the sand you either put on the red hat and fall in line or you play back. Some would argue we've already reached that point mind you, but I think that would be the last reasonable line.

[-] 3abas@lemmy.world 37 points 1 month ago

This is the line?

No, this is the goalpost moving.

Anyone who didn't see this coming was either living under a rock or mockingly dismissing everyone telling them it's coming as Russian bots trying to take votes away from Democrats.

[-] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 month ago

never boo someone for being late to a party, just hand them a beer

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago

Yes, this is the Red Line. We have never suspended elections in this country for any reason, not even during the Civil War. The Midterms are the LAST CHANCE for Democrats to begin to take power back from MAGA legally, and if that last opportunity is stolen, then the only option left is violence.

Canceling elections, for any reason, is a BRIGHT RED LINE, and we must not allow our elected officials to cross that line, or allow our elected officials to look the other way. We have to let them ALL know that the Midterm election will go on as usual, and MAGA will accept the outcome, no matter what it is.

And we have to also let them know that if MAGA cancel elections, and our Dem representatives allow it, they will BOTH suffer in the inevitable violence that will follow. Whether you actively committed treason, or just say back and let it happen, you are equally guilty.

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Let’s be honest. That’s the red line

There's been many red lines this past year. And this one isn't even a surprise move, it's been claimed loudly semi-continuously for five years now. Yet here we are.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 56 points 1 month ago

Why wouldn’t he commit more crimes? He’s been committing crimes with impunity his entire life. Who’s going to stop him?

Wait, are we still all thinking he'll peacefully leave the white house after the shit he pulled last time?

[-] hector@lemmy.today 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's not even about him, it's the party. He didn't start the campaign to fix elections, the party did after they successfully bullied the democrats out of the 2000 election and filibustered a recount with court challenges and Ginsberg crossed over and endorsed the steal.

You can draw a straight line from the stolen 2000 election through 2020 to now. And it was stolen in multiple ways, from voter suppression, purging valid voters from rolls, putting faulty machines in democratic districts and otherwise sabotaging their use, throwing ballots in the trash from democratic districts, and so on.

This doesn't end with the president.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago
[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 11 points 1 month ago

Really hope he doesn't die peacefully. At the very least he should take a violent shit in his pants before passing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 51 points 1 month ago

REPUBLICANS should get Sole Control over who Wins Elections? They MUST Need some FUNDING for that! Let's GIVE it to Them!

-Chuck Schumer (D) and Hakeem Jeffries (D)!

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago

Don't forget to ask for more funding for Democrats so they can continue their fight, this time for reals, honest.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago

More treason.

In a healthy nation the Republican party would be disbanded and outlawed.

But this isn't a healthy nation, so assuming we get to continue having elections and they are fair and the Republicans lose, I expect American's hamster brains to completely forget about this in one or two election cycles and start flirting with letting these traitors have power again.

This dipshit proved who he was the first time around and we only managed to get through one term without him before letting a child back into the Oval Office. We're a very stupid nation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] femtek@lemmy.blahaj.zone 41 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean the food, seats, and extra stuff is a lot better than AMC. The only reason I went to the AMC near me was for iron lung and so many seats had stains and the bathroom was ehhh.

Edit: Not sure how it went to this post, my b

[-] Morphite88 35 points 1 month ago
[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago

Wait — let ‘em cook.

[-] 13igTyme@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'll upvote this because it was funny to read in an otherwise depressing and aggravating political post.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dellish@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Trump’s comments come as Republicans in Congress push a bill that would enable massive voter purges, impose photo ID requirements, and ban ranked-choice voting, universal mail-in ballots, and the acceptance of mailed ballots that arrive after Election Day.

And you just KNOW the Democraps are going to let them have it all too.

[-] dancroissant@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

I can see Schumer now, giving a forceful floor speech, his fist in the air, half-glasses on the podium, "rest assured, this matter is not concluded!" Then promptly voting yes with a promise from republicans that we'll vote on something else later maybe.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 month ago

Surely the guys with big trucks flying Don't Tread on Me flags are against this

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago

They think they'll be doing the treading. They are mistaken, but they won't realize until it's too late to save themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

The thing is, there's no mechanism for nationalizing voting, and I don't really see a clear path for Republicans to do that in the next nine months. They'd have to pass legislation to do that, which would be extremely difficult given their margins in congress. Even then, states control elections as a function of the Constitution, and while the Supreme Court is happy to approve whatever unconstitutional bullshit Trump dreams up, it will take times to get through the courts. He could try to seize control of the voting process from states, but I don't know that he has the infrastructure to manage the whole voting process through the executive branch, and the fact that he's asking the Republicans to do this for him makes me think he knows this. Either way, any kind of coup on the election process would face the same legal challenges as legislation.

That doesn't mean we shouldn't be extremely worried. I think it's unlikely that the Republicans will, "nationalize the voting," but I think it's very likely he'll send federal goons in to, "prevent voter fraud," (AKA suppress the vote).

[-] OshagHennessey@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

The Executive Order has been their "clear path" to all sorts of shit they have no right doing.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Yes, but most of those have either not been achieved yet or have only been achieved because they were relatively easy. He tried to abolish the 14th Amendment through EO on day one, and it's just getting to the Supreme Court now. He's been able to illegally dissolve federal agencies because the Republicans in Congress have abdicated their power, and destroying something is much easier than building it.

Even if he signs an EO to take over the elections tomorrow, he'll still face legal challenges that will likely wind up in the Supreme Court, and he'll still need to build out the infrastructure to run these elections federally, something the federal government has never done. I'm not saying that he can't steal the elections, or that we shouldn't be worried, but the idea that he's just going to, "federalize," elections in fifteen states before the midterms seems pretty unlikely.

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Listen to what you just said. Congress won't act to stop him and SCOTUS takes a year before they might stop him. If he does do an EO tomorrow, the legality of the order likely won't be settled until after the midterms. The only things in his way are logistics and the people.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

He's been saying this kind of thing all along, either canceling or rigging the elections. Why is it only a fire now?

[-] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The election was quite close in Minnesota, and Harris won it. Of all the states won by the Democrats, Minnesota had the closest margin.

Is his plan as blatant as taking the demographic that voted against him, loading them into a van, and disappearing them?

https://www.bbc.com/news/election/2024/us/results

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Republicans” should.

Not the States, not bipartisan whatever…just them. That tells you everything.

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Quickly: let’s do nothing!!!

[-] MIDItheKID@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

So less state rights? And more big government? The cornerstone of the Republican party?

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

The party of small government strikes again.

Pathetic.

[-] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

We all knew he would do anything and everything possible to stop the midterms. He knows he will go to prison if he gets impeached and charged, so he is waging a full on war on every right we have.

This november will be very interesting with thousands of DHS gestapo at local voting station intimidating voters, GOP refusing to swear in democratic winners, and the hourly posts by the president telling his cult everything is rigged and they are all going to have to fight for something BS.

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago
[-] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 month ago

Why are you posting a picture of your president's toilet paper?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

You want to nationalize the voting system? Okay, get congressional republicans to submit a bill for an amendment to the constitution, pass it through both houses, institute a constitutional convention, get 2/3 of states to ratify.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

If by now Americans don’t believe him when the orange shitstain talks… they deserve the inevitable dictatorship they themselves installed.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
724 points (98.8% liked)

News

36693 readers
2218 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS