"It's not about drugs. If it was, Trump wouldn't have pardoned one of the largest narco traffickers in the world last month. It's about oil and regime change. And they need a trial now to pretend that it isn't. Especially to distract from Epstein + skyrocketing healthcare costs," she claimed in a social media publication.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 253 points 8 months ago* (19 children)

Yes Trump literally said in his speech that's what it's about, they're not even trying to hide it anymore.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 88 points 8 months ago (16 children)

    Shit, pretty sure he's on tape telling Netentyahu, that starting a war to cancel elections is a great idea that he wants to do.

    He wants a regime change eventually, and so does the money behind him.

    But what trump wants more, is anything that will cancel midterms and last long enough to cancel the next presidential too.

    That's why he's doing this, holding onto political power is the golden goose. Not even trump is dumb enough to kill and eat the goose. As we get closer to elections, we'll see him pass on money if it means holding onto power longer. But if midterms happen and he loses the House, that's a lot of lost power, which means less money from bribes/grifts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 60 points 8 months ago (10 children)

    Shit, pretty sure he’s on tape telling Netentyahu, that starting a war to cancel elections is a great idea that he wants to do.

    But what trump wants more, is anything that will cancel midterms and last long enough to cancel the next presidential too.

    The craziest and saddiest part of this theory most people were alive when the US invaded Iraq and Afghanistan. Those elections were never cancelled.

    If the US does proceed with a full on invastion of Venezuela. Trumpie tells everyone that the elections has to be cancelled. There is a going to be sizeable part of the population that is going "Yeah, cancelling the elections during a war makes sense". Even though most of them were alive during the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    There's no provision in US law for suspension of elections. No matter what we hold elections. Now they'll certainly be ratfucked to hell and back but any suspension of elections will be totally illegal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 98 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    As always, she is absolutely right.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 92 points 8 months ago (20 children)

    Funniest part was Russia denouncing unprovoked US actions.

  • source
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    A special military operation to overthrow a government that takes less than 3 days, only a few hours to be precise..... Must be hard to see others achieve that when you are not even close to that at day nr. 1,409.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 8 months ago

    This reminds me of Bush standing on an aircraft carrier with a "Mission Accomplished" banner behind him. Trump says he's gonna run Venezuela and seize their oil. The violence is only just beginning.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 75 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    It's not just about oil, its about sour crude oil.

    USA is an oil exporter. Why does it need more oil? The answer is, it doesn't. But US oil companies need sour crude oil for their refineries, built during the 70's and 80's to refine exactly the kind of oil produced in Venezuela. Not designed to refine the shale oil produced in the fracking boom.

    It's all about the oil companies margins, and it will be paid for in American and Venezuelan blood. Because why pay to refit your refineries when human lives and presidencies are so cheap?

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 62 points 8 months ago

    AOC is completely right.

  • source
  • [–] 44 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    “Slams” omg this needs to stop. “AOC says the Truth Out loud.”

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago

    Even trump, for once, said the truth out loud

    We're going to have our very large United States oil companies (...) go in, spend billions of dollars, fix the badly broken infrastructure, the oil infrastructure (...) Let's start making money

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 43 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Anyone else getting sick of the word "slams" in headlines? She posted online on social media. Yes she's right but this "slams" thing is really getting old.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 38 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Do people criticizing AOC have any idea how limited a house members direct power is. The most impactful thing she can do from her seat on a regular basis is normalize the contempt. She’s not even a senator ffs. I really hope we’re able to rally against the hateful bigots. This country is a mess and full of dumbass tools blissfully ignorant to reality in every corner.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 28 points 8 months ago

    You Should Know: The "Cartel de las Soles" isn't actually a real cartel.

    See, the Venezuelan military uses a sun insignia for generals, where the US military uses a star. A journalist invented the term in 1993 to talk about corruption in the Venezuelan military. Get it? All the members of this "cartel" wear suns. But, it's not a real cartel. Not everybody who wears a sun (i.e. is a general) is necessarily involved in crimes, and those that are aren't necessarily working together.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Well, as long as she SLAMMED it. Guess thats it people. Good job everyone.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    You hear that everybody? She slammed it. It's been slammed. It's ok, no need to panic, everybody knows everything's fine as long as it gets slammed. No need for any further action here; it's been slammed.

    Slam.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 8 months ago (11 children)

    Turns out Ghina got really good at renewables while we were deliberately looking away. And Ghina is too big to invade. Guess we'll have to double down on oil. And somehow these guys have more oil than the Saudis. Not for long...

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Then do something about it. Have the congressional police arrest Trump, Vance, and Secretary of Defense Hegseth.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    I mean, you don’t actually expect that to be possible right? Think of the implication that would have, where republicans would just arrest the president for wearing a tan suit.

    I get that these are more obvious crimes, but the idea that a single member of the house could mobilize any kind of force to arrest the sitting president is insanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    So do you really think that one Congresswoman has the power to arrest a sitting president? Hell even if you took all the progressives and what remains of the squad, do you really think those numbers are enough to pull what could only be a coup?

    Truly though, I think the reason Trump is going to get away with this and the reason Bush got away with his bullshit before is because of nonsense statements like this.

    Also there's no such thing as Congressional police. You may be trying to refer to the Capitol Police, but they can't even successfully arrest insurrectionists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 19 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Have you ever seen someone pull a trailer using bungee cords, or use a bare wire in an electrical socket, or use a power tool without any safety gear? It's frustrating if they get away with it, and as a result learn that what they did was a good idea.

    What's really awful about this Venezuela operation is that the initial phase of it actually went just fine. No American soldiers were killed, Maduro was captured alive and uninjured, and so on. It was an incredibly stupid and reckless thing to do. But, for the moment, everything went as well as the Department of War could hope. It will probably have bad long-term diplomatic consequences, but those aren't visible yet. If there's a phase 2 of this "war", it's probably going to have unseen issues. For the moment though, they got away with it.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 18 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    It's not even regime change, the old Maduro supporting regime is still running the show. The VP was on a visit in Russia when this happened.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    It's about the redactions.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago

    Not primarily. I think it's simultaneously to steal oil, as is tradition with American Republicans, and also to cover any domestic issues. The fact that Trump raped dozens of kids, and he deleted and redacted millions of documents to cover that up, is one of those domestic issues. The others are the economy, ICE being a gestapo that disappears anyone the regime doesn't like, and the establishment of "quick reaction forces" in the US military to deploy against protesters (look it up, it's real).

    We about to get really hot here in America.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 8 months ago (7 children)

    AOC is spot on! The USA is on the same shitty level as the Russians and they have given a free pass for China to attack Taiwan.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    I'm not some tankie or anything, but with Russia being allowed to take Crimea in 2014, and give it a few weeks, but I suspect the world will do fuck all about the US invading and annexing Venezuela. What is stopping China from taking Taiwan? The biggest players on the world stage has shown time and time again, that you can just take land because you want it, so why shouldn't China just take Taiwan? What would make an invasion of Taiwan worse than an invasion of Venezuela, Ukraine or Afghanistan?

    Just to make sure everyone understands, I don't think any of them should be allowed to take any other country's land, but the world has shown it's completely acceptable for any reason, including wanting more oil, wanting natural ressources and farmable land, or wanting to blow up brown people.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 17 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    So much for Tulsi Gabbard's weirdly specific position against "regime change wars".

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 14 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    It's even better.

    Trump already stabbed the Venezuelan people in the back.

    They are working with the vice president, meaning this has nothing to do with liberation. Nothing. Simply control of resources, nothing else.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 14 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    And yet Americans will do nothing except demonstrate how servile they are to the state.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 13 points 8 months ago

    Even Trump is a shitty copy of 2003's Iraq. The man has no originality. First he poorly copies Mussolini and now Dubya.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Thank god they put "slams" in the headline, otherwise lemmy's anti-progressive contributors might not have an easy excuse to ignore AOC.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›