"It's not about drugs. If it was, Trump wouldn't have pardoned one of the largest narco traffickers in the world last month. It's about oil and regime change. And they need a trial now to pretend that it isn't. Especially to distract from Epstein + skyrocketing healthcare costs," she claimed in a social media publication.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I mean, you don’t actually expect that to be possible right? Think of the implication that would have, where republicans would just arrest the president for wearing a tan suit.

I get that these are more obvious crimes, but the idea that a single member of the house could mobilize any kind of force to arrest the sitting president is insanity.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Which is more insane:

    A member of congress operating unilaterally to arrest members of the Executive branch to halt their criminal actions?

    Or the Executive branch acting unilaterally to wage war illegally on a sovereign nation?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    You’re missing my point. A singular member of congress has zero authority, nor avenue to accomplish, arresting a sitting president. It isn’t just “it isn’t done, don’t do that” it’s “there’s no way to accomplish that.”

  • source
  • parent