The move comes amid outcry from Democrats after the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts affixed Trump's name to its sign in Washington.

Donald Trump’s name is being attached to a new class of U.S. battleships that will have nuclear capabilities.

Making the announcement at an event at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida, Navy Secretary John Phelan referred to the warships as “Trump-class battleships" and said a forthcoming vessel dubbed the USS Defiant will be “the largest, deadliest and most versatile and best-looking warship anywhere on the world’s oceans.”

Trump’s eponymous battleships will be armed with guns and missiles, as well as hypersonic weapons, electronic rail guns and high-powered lasers.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 80 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

It was probably easier for the DoW to pretend that this cruiser is a battleship than to make Trump understand that the battleships he keeps demanding are useless in a modern war.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 63 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    Next Dem should reclassify “Trump Ship” to mean the shittiest possible boat. Leave it as a classification, just redefine it

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 49 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Wow, I thought this was a joke.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 8 months ago (14 children)

    I'm calling it: Trump is one Western movie watch away from ordering the military to bring back cavalry.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 8 months ago* (1 child)

    https://sopuli.xyz/post/38499583

    Russia Continues Using Cavalry in Failed Assault, OSINT-Shared Video Reveals

    1000009338

    Footage shared by the OSINT community shows Russian forces attempting to storm a Ukrainian position using a horse for transport, an assault that was ultimately halted by a Ukrainian drone strike, according to video published by Exilenova+ on December 22.

    While unusual at first glance, the incident aligns with earlier reports indicating that Russian frontline units have increasingly relied on animals as substitutes for destroyed or unavailable military vehicles.

    The Napoleonic era is coming back, baby.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    We still have the cavalry, stetsons and all. Unless you mean like actual horse cavalry. The U.S. Army still maintains horses and stables. But the horses are mostly just for ceremonial/parade purposes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago (8 children)

    It's a very small unit, though, from memory.

    Also, occasionally US special forces have used horses in unusual, rugged terrain. There was some unit in Afghanistan that had some technical claim to being the most-recent cavalry charge in history.

    searches

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_Mazar-i-Sharif

    1000009339

    Photo showing U.S. Army Special Forces and U.S. Air Force Combat Controllers in "the first American cavalry charge of the 21st century"[19] with General Dostum and his forces (Taken October 2001)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (6 children)

    Ceremonial horse cavalry is small, but 1st Cavalry Division still exists. Its more light armor and mechanized infantry instead of horse cavalry though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (5 children)

    Do they actually have horses?

    searches

    Apparently yes, though it's not huge either and it sounds like they're being dissolved too:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Cavalry_Division_Horse_Cavalry_Detachment

    The 40-soldier unit is equipped with 33 dark bay horses with minimal white markings which are outfitted with Model 1885 McClellan riding saddles that are hand-made by cavalry troopers in an on-site leather shop maintained at the unit's stables.

    On 2 July 2025 the Army announced that the Military Working Equid program that includes the 1st Cavalry Division Horse Cavalry Detachment will cease operations and associated assets (MWEs) will be transferred, adopted, or donated within one year.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 35 points 8 months ago (4 children)

    The new vessels, which the president calls battleships, will be the latest in what the White House envisions as a Golden Fleet.

    golden ship

    Dunno. They're quite easy to spot, aren't they?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 26 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    image

    Surprised this hasn't been posted yet in this thread.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Sir the autopilot is hard coded to go to some island

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Sir. The battleship is unavailable because of its bone spurs

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    Bastard is trying to put his name so many places it’ll be damned near impossible to get rid of them all.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago

    Naming a class of ships after a (checks notes) draft dodger. Makes sense to me.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    There's a reason we don't have battleships anymore all around the world.

    If you put all the firepower on one platform, you lose everything when that platform sinks. With the sophisticated asymmetrical weaponry out there, plus the ability to use cheap drone swarms, it's much smarter to spread the firepower over multiple platforms.

    But diaper Donny the crooked pedo wants what all dictators want: compensate their micropenis with everything made bigger and more impressive than others while adding their name onto everything.

    One torpedo and your golden battleship will be a very effective new coral reef.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    So it'll be 300% over budget, be riddled with problems from cutting every possible corner, torpedo itself, blame Biden, and then explode in public?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (6 children)

    That battleship appears to have no large guns, a stealthy hull, a helicopter platform, and I doubt armor, given the superstructure.

    This kind of comes off to me like some of Japan's "destroyers".

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Izumo-class_destroyer

    1000009337

    I'm wondering if what happened here is that the Navy wanted a cruiser and Trump wanted more honors.

    EDIT: I'd also add that tradition is almost always to name the class after the lead ship, but the "Trump class", assuming the artist rendition there is of the lead ship, appears to be of a USS Defiant, not the USS Donald J. Trump. Not that I'm complaining


    I've long prefered the old British Navy style use of names like HMS Invincible or HMS Glorious or whatnot stuff. The USS Enterprise for the US, etc.

    EDIT2: Apparently, based on other articles, the hull classification symbol is "BBG", which has never been used, but would theoretically refer to a guided missile battleship, so it could have a bunch of VLS cells for armament. I'm a little hazy on what would distinguish it from a guided missile cruiser (CG), though.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 16 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    Is this like space force or the golden dome? Ie. a steaming pile of bullshit from the Swiss cheese mind of a dementia ward patient??

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 8 months ago (2 children)

    There won't be any battleship.

    This is just another grift to streak the government coffers dry

    Same with the " golden dome", "doge", etc... all scams so his buddies can get lucrative contracts.

    Even so, this is suuuuch a sad thing. A five year old would make a fantasy battle ship and name it after himself. Its pathetic

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 8 months ago

    It’s gonna smell like shit and for some reason everything’s gonna lean towards the bow

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 8 months ago

    Mega projects, no less with vanity as the centerpieces are a sign of weak militaries. The strong militaries are pursuing drone and anti drone technologies. Russian frigates warships are disabled by small Ukrainian aqua drones; and are hiding at port. The bigger they are, the harder they fall.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago

    The complex this man has about his small penis is insane.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 8 months ago

    USS Bone Spur

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (9 children)

    USS Floating Pedo Party Palace

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 11 points 8 months ago

    The world's first orange battleship that fucks kids

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Here I am thinking how this will play out once MAGA ends. How was it in Germany after the war? I bet there used to be Hitler and Himmler Streets etc.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    So fart class.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    Alladeen alladeen

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    Dude, I was literally thinking this a couple weeks ago, Trump bringing back battleships is completely on brand for him and I'm surprised honestly it took him this long

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 8 months ago

    Our military needs to start pushing back, international pressure of war crimes needs to be loud.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago

    As soon as the next president comes in, it's scorched earth time.

  • source
  • It's becoming increasingly hard to see him as a man and not a toddler.

    Are we sure he "aced" all those tests he did lately?

    Edit: I just saw the article's image of him showing the ship. Shit, it really looks like a bad render of a 90's videogame... How can people say he's mentally fit?

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 8 months ago (3 children)

    Didn't we stop using battleships once stuff like guided missiles started being common?

    We've seen in Ukraine how much destruction cheap drones can do when used intelligently.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 9 points 8 months ago* (3 children)

    By the time they are actually finished being constructed, he will likely be long dead. Not even being malicious; military vessel construction is slow as balls.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    Very bold of you to assume that any of them will ever finish construction. It feels like the US Navy has canceled more new ships than it's built in the past couple decades.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 8 months ago (1 child)

    Why put 50 billion into one weapons platform when it can be sunk by a cheap drone?

    I don't get it.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›