-1
submitted 2 months ago by xz25@opensocial.at to c/libertarian@lemmy.ca

What's better from a #libertarian perspective? The federal government staying out of it to avoid infringing on the "rights" of a state to set its own laws, or the federal government "encouraging" states to remove laws that are considered harmful for businesses? @libertarian The Trump Administration’s Order on AI Is Deeply Misguided

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] MotoAsh@piefed.social 2 points 2 months ago

It is deeply misguided... even from a logical regulation standpoint. Though to think federal law "infringes" on the rights of states is to completely and utterly fail to understand the absolute foundations of states in a larger government...

I'm ready to get downvoted by all the absolute moronic ancaps that think corporations should be able to do what ever they want, but this is stupid from any angle.

[-] xz25@opensocial.at 1 points 2 months ago

@MotoAsh

"infringes" on the rights of states

I think I agree with you, but my quotes would be around "rights".

[-] ICCrawler@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Oh, pish posh, I'm sure its all very guided somehow. Guiding money right into his' and his buddies' pockets.

[-] mech@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

Hmm, would it be more libertarian to let others be as libertarian (or not) as they like, or to force everyone to be libertarian?

[-] xz25@opensocial.at 1 points 2 months ago

no one can force anyone to be a libertarian. The question here isn't around what people do or not, its what states do or not.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
-1 points (44.4% liked)

Libertarians

165 readers
5 users here now

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS