581
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] brem@sh.itjust.works 11 points 5 months ago

Title should read:

#Chipotle goes under after last willing customer cratered pants after eating Chipotle

[-] MSids@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

I feel like I'm trying to rationalize insanity, and I do understand the reason, but why does the burrito company need stock?

[-] Soleos@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

As opposed to young people with jobs who can afford their food...?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lengau@midwest.social 10 points 6 months ago

Maybe I'd eat there if they sold food.

[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

And if it was cheaper. Real texmex costs less

[-] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago

Hell real proper Mexican food costs less. Literally went to a Mexican restaurant last week and it was $17 for a fuck ton of food. And that includes a drink, chips, salsa and guacamole on top of the 2 meals worth of food.

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

They could try not making as much per customer to increase the number of customers. This though would mean they were not gouging enough money per sale. A loop for which they can not get past.

[-] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 5 months ago

Shit, I discovered Izzos Illegal Burrito and it’s much better at a fraction of the cost!

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 6 months ago

I just go to Cava instead these days. Way better

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I remember when Chipotle was still a Colorado-only thing. Better than Subway or Quiznos and the price was right. You could get in, get lunch, and get out relatively quickly.

I don't know that things went pear-shaped the very instant they started their massive expansion everywhere, but it's been different for quite a long time. Like a lot of brands, I'm sure they sputtered along on their reputation mostly and the place made money even if consumers started to get disillusioned.

Used to be that Qdoba and Chipotle seemed to be pretty decent options, but I'm always kind of disappointed in both these days. Qdoba offered Impossible Meat as an option for a while, but seemingly no longer does...

[-] Taldan@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

I think it's just a classic case of profit maximization. Chipotle felt pressure from shareholders to continue increasing profit every quarter, and that inherently involves cutting costs and increasing prices

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

Yeah, it's pretty annoying - publicly traded companies must constantly be growing. Something like a restaurant cannot just be successful in making a mere profit, oh no, it has to be compared to last quarter/last year...even if it means endangering everything that made the restaurant successful in the first place...

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Better than Subway or Quiznos and the price was right.

Yes I literally remember when a meatless chipotle bowl was only $6.45.

I'm pretty sure I haven't eaten there since those good old days.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] BellaJones@thebrainbin.org 8 points 6 months ago

They prefer to cook at home.

[-] Alenalda@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

10+$ for a mostly rice burrito? hard pass

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago
[-] 1985MustangCobra@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago

wait, people were able to afford it before? never went becuase it was overpriced.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
581 points (98.8% liked)

News

37365 readers
1897 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS