34
submitted 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Meta along with Ray-Ban announced new smart glasses and the YT reviewers are praising it.

For me, I don't find them particularly good and being a Meta product, it will be horrible for privacy. Also people can record others without their knowledge with these, hell no!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

If my producer or I saw them on one's face, we'd rip them off and smash them unapologetically. We'd also call them out for potentially violating our privacy without realizing it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

Fuck no. I don't need to record my life to share it with the world. Even if people would be interested in it, why do I need to be sharing so much of my life.

[-] [email protected] 17 points 7 hours ago

I wouldn't use anything from Meta, no exceptions.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago

When some foss alternative releases at an affordable price, yes.

See y'all in 2077

[-] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago

Not from Meta for sure.

And for all the people hating on these there are real world applications that could truly help folks. I’m very ADHD. My brain goes on tangents. I forget mid sentence what I was going to say. I have a terrible time remembering peoples names. These are all things this type of technology could help me with. But they would have to be implemented with the correct privacy guards in place. And I wouldn’t touch anything from Zuck with a 39 ½ foot pole.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

These are valid reasons that I'd consider getting one for myself. But big tech says fuck accessibility, let's cram it full of bullshit instead. And that's on top of the privacy concerns that they seem focused on shoving under the rug rather than making it obvious if someone's using these.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago

Nope. I can wait for the chip implant to broadcast ads in my sleep.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

Looks like we just found our new head of marketing boys! Tells us more about ads in people's sleep.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago

“Lightspeed briefs, for men on the go!”

[-] [email protected] 25 points 12 hours ago

No, and I think they oughta be illegal. I don't want to be recorded.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

somebody tried to bring them to our psych ward and argue that they needed them because they were prescription (in fairness they were but bruh). it was a shitshow.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 8 hours ago

Never, and I would be offended if I noticed someone with them looking at me.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 13 hours ago

I wear glasses as anyways and I'd love a heads up display. Augmented reality where I could basically spawn full sized displays anywhere for work would be nice too. I'd probably need a device to control it somehow too.

However, I wouldn't want them from Google, Apple, Meta or any of the other large corporations. Not coupled with their walled gardens, their subscriptions, their EULAs and terms and conditions and "updates" I didn't ask for.

I just want the hardware and a driver for Linux. Connect the glasses via WiFi to my own computer and run the applications on this computer. If I want to use the glasses outside of my home, I would set up a VPN and use my phone to create a WiFi hotspot.

However, I'm pretty sure nobody is going to build it like that, so I'll never have smart glasses. Which is fine.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

You can buy various HMDs that essentially mount to your existing glasses (I bought and fiddled about with one during the lockdown) and attach to any computer that supports USB. I haven't looked into whether there are any wireless options now, but you could satisfy at least some of your desires with that kind of thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 11 hours ago

Remember Google Glass?
Same story here. Neat tech but no chance buddy

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

I almost bought the even realties G1, but they seemed to lock you into their AI companion.

Though I think they opened it up after release, would still consider them if it can be only your self hosted AI

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

Nothing smart technology promises over dumb technology is something I ever wanted in the first place.

I just want phones to be phones, TVs to be TVs, and glasses to be glasses.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago

Isn’t tech already creepy enough, how’s this going to make things better, I can see limited good uses cases as opposed to how it’s being used most of the time right now

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago

Not unless they had some sort of UI in the glass that you can focus on, and some sort of visual Augmented reality system.

If it's just a bullshit piece of plastic with a camera that speaks to you then why the fuck would i stick that on my face? Just make it a necklace or something there's no reason for it to be glasses.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago

If the data it collects was only on my devices and I can customize the settings to collect what is ant when I want. But that will never happen. It can't be a tool I purchase and use solely for my benefit, the person who owns it. Fuck these tech fascistsnjunkies, I hope they all fucking die of cancer.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 17 hours ago

I'll be the outlier and say that given the perfect circumstances, I would buy Smart Glasses. BUT in no way, shape, or form would I buy META Smart Glasses.

I work a retail job where I'm staring at shelves for like 80% of my shift, it would be dope as hell to have smart glasses and have a video playing in my vision while I'm working.

But until there are more of an "open source" type Smart Glasses that aren't supported by one of the big companies like Meta or Apple, I'll join the rest of y'all on staying far away from them.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago

There’s open source but not video capable. The Brilliant Labs Halo glasses coming in November are more of an informational companion with a peripheral-view display rather than a field of view overlay. So it’s not what you’re looking for now, but maybe a generation or two later it’ll meet your needs.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 31 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It'll be a hard no for any smart glasses from Meta or Google.

However, in the very distant and not quite guaranteed future, I would consider smart glasses (again, NOT by Meta/Google/etc) for accessibility.

As someone with auditory processing disorder, it would be a game changer if I had the ability to read live closed captions of what someone is saying, while they are talking to me. That would be my only use case.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 15 hours ago

No! Anyone who buys a phone on their head for $800 is the reason humanity is getting destroyed by corps

[-] [email protected] 5 points 15 hours ago

Just try this epidermal implant. You'll love it. But, you'll need the brain implant to activate it...

[-] [email protected] 13 points 15 hours ago

I wanted a wearable computer with a head-mounted display real bad until the justified backlash against Google Glass ruined it for everyone.

This is a category of device that cannot be allowed to be implemented as a surveillance-capitalist product, only as Open Hardware.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 14 hours ago

Even open source, it should not happen. Nobody should have a camera on them that isn't identifiable as recording them. Phones are bad enough but at least you know where the camera is pointing. It's why I keep my phone parallel with the ground in public. Cameras on glasses should not exist in any way, shape or form because you can't know if it's recording you or not. And honestly I want nothing to do with a cyberpunk future.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

I mean, pandora's box has already been pried open with a crowbar and the lid thrown into a woodchipper. Hidden cameras have been accessible to the mass public for almost a decade at this point.

At this point having a model that could be assembled and controlled by the end user means that the recorded data is within their possession. It might be for naught tho, as passerby could have their Meta lenses recording without any knowledge of the consequences.

But hey, now you can expose your workplace abuse with video evidence in court! XD

[-] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

That's just straight up not a good future.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, but good luck re-glueing the wood chips and sealing that malformed box, man. Might as well improvise with what's on the horizon.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

That's a defeatist attitude before its even really big

[-] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

Depends which company makes them. Probably not

[-] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago

Every idiot wearing this dystopian Stasi shit needs to be punched in the face.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 14 hours ago

Tech isn't fun anymore. Why do I want to act as a spy camera for big corporations

[-] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

The use-cases that I see advertised are not things that I do in my day-to-day. I usually place my phone on a drawer or leave it in my backpack - I definitely don't want it on my face.

So, to me, smart glasses feel like an uncomfortable gimmick at this point. Maybe there is something amazing about them that has not yet clicked with me, but for the time being I don't see me buying one of these for the foreseeable future.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 17 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 17 points 17 hours ago

In concept, they're the kind of sci-fi shit I dreamed of as a kid. The reality is that they'll be locked-down useless trash that you pay out the ass to spy on you.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 14 hours ago

And on everybody else.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 17 hours ago

I would not wear one and would never trust anyone that would.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 16 hours ago

I'm mildly interested in the technology, but I sure as hell wouldn't go anywhere near Meta-branded anything. For starters, based on the demo, the product fucking sucks, but then there's also the privacy and fascism issues.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 17 hours ago

Absolutely fucking not. I have literally no interest in being more online. That sounds depressing.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 16 hours ago

i'd buy glasses that would scramble the vision of smart glasses

[-] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

IR blaster glasses with a toggle switch could be pretty easy to make with today's tech.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago

I'd love them, but like others have said, not if made by Meta, and not if they rely on sending all my data to cloud services to function.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 17 hours ago

I saw how impossible it was to actually take the WhatsApp call for Zuckerberg himself.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2025
34 points (76.6% liked)

Asklemmy

50513 readers
1068 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS