598
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml to c/politics@lemmy.world

Politico reports that at a Hamptons fundraiser last Saturday, Cuomo told his well-heeled supporters that, contrary to all available evidence, he could win the New York mayoral race as an independent—because he was likely to have the implicit support of President Donald Trump.

The imperative of defeating Mamdani justified the new coalition Cuomo is trying to create of his die-hard loyalists (who are Democrats) with Trump Republicans.

Some of that latter group might be tempted to back Curtis Sliwa, the actual GOP nominee in the race. Cuomo told these donors, “We can minimize [the Sliwa] vote, because he’ll never be a serious candidate. And Trump himself, as well as top Republicans, will say the goal is to stop Mamdani. And you’ll be wasting your vote on Sliwa.” Cuomo went on to emphasize that he’d be a mayor who could find common ground with Trump:

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] MBech@feddit.dk 119 points 5 months ago

The democratic party, where fascism is better than welfare and empathy.

load more comments (37 replies)
[-] Marshezezz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 68 points 5 months ago

Libs will suck off fascists at the drop of a hat if they think it’ll benefit them, what’s new?

load more comments (25 replies)
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 66 points 5 months ago

This is why the Democratic party stinks. Just cynical assholes only loyal to power.

You think Gavan Newsom is different?

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 49 points 5 months ago

Nope, Newsom vetoes progressive voter referendums all the time in deference to established power and corporations. Just look at what happens in Cali when power companies are at fault for massive wildfires due to negligent equipment/line upkeep…

The state has the 4th largest economy in the world, and yet simultaneously has incredible wealth disparity, a crisis of unhoused people and untreated mental health issues with no affordable/free housing in sight, and crumbling roads/infrastructure everywhere. It is not well run.

So yeah, Newsom wouldn’t be my first pick based on substance. But on style, yes, he’s fighting fire with fire. Hell, he’s simply just doing something to fight, and myself and many others love to see it. More of this from all Dems please, especially those who aren’t full on corporate shills. AOC - now is your time to step up, let’s go!

[-] Gustephan@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

Im glad somebody is fighting trump, but good lord i do not want California to become the blueprint for America. Driving along the PCH from avocado farms in Oxnard to Malibu and seeing the sick fucking filth that is the California wealthy right next to the migrant workers they exploit is in my top 5 "most disturbing things ive ever experienced." That is taking into account that I used to work on strategic bombers and I know in gruesome detail what a 2000 lb bomb does to a human body. Newsom is a bitter poison pill whose voting record shows that he basically agrees with Trump across the board, and his imitation of trump is barely even ironic. He's always imitated trump in terms of policy.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (47 replies)
[-] thedruid@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

The " dems are different from repubs" crew is eating a shit sandwich now.

Its RICH VS POOR YA GOONS

[-] MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml 18 points 5 months ago

But the Dems didn't elect this guy. He lost the Dem vote.

But yes, it is Have vs Have Nots

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago

"Cuomo went on to emphasize that he’d be a mayor who could find common ground with Trump."

No. You can't. Unless your lips become orange, you can't. So stop trying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 4_degrees@lemmy.world 33 points 5 months ago

Hey, scratch a liberal and all...

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] unconsequential@slrpnk.net 27 points 5 months ago

Are we all going to sing kumbaya my lord around the legacy of Bush, and how he is just a sweet old grandpa, and run a campaign with Cheneys again? No? Just full on Trumpism this round, eh?

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago

More evidence that the Democrats exist specifically to defeat any actual progressive candidates.

The fact that he’d rather side with fascists than democratic socialists tells you all you need to know about where he stands politically.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] shiroininja@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago

To the surprise of no one. Did people really think this suit was a liberal? Lmao. I never saw it.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 29 points 5 months ago

Lol. He's as "Liberal" as most elected Democrats... That is to say that he's a greedy, neoliberal, corporate whore; without any conviction, morals or ethics.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 13 points 5 months ago

The only reason Trump would support Cuomo is if Cuomo had already pledged to allow ICE free reign. He's already selling out NYC, and he's not even the Mayor yet.

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 months ago
[-] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 11 points 5 months ago

trying to hitch a ride on the bandwagon

[-] icystar@lemmy.cif.su 10 points 5 months ago

Why do people in major cities like New York and Las Vegas love getting conned?

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago

Because establishment candidates have big money and the media like New York Times behind them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago
[-] kreskin@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

A democrat who was a trumper the whole time? So surprised.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2025
598 points (98.5% liked)

politics

28265 readers
1834 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS