As an European, I want Americans to fight against fascism, at the same time, it sounds like it would require civil war, and if that happens, then the sharks circling around US would use that opportunity to make some moves. This whole thing makes me uneasy. Y'all need to be smart about this.

Dont forget to buy lots of ammo. Guns dont do much without ammo.

Can you explain the difference between? I don’t understand the point you’re trying to make.

The US was founded on ostensibly three major legal ideas.

Habeus Corpus.
Due Process.
The Magna Carta.

We don't seem to currently have any of the three.

I find it so strange how proud Americans are of their constitution, which was copied largely from British laws; who kinda shat on this part of their history…

The idea of habeas corpus was around long before 1166. We know other much older civilizations had courts and the right to a confront ones accusers.

Damn that hits so close to home now.

What's going on right now is actually a fantastic example of why this whole "people can have guns to overthrow a tyrant!" has been nothing more than a delusion used to justify having a gun fetish. It's 2025. Your gun will do absolutely nothing against the literal trillion dollars of annual spending you've approved for your own military and intelligence agencies.

The ones that cry the hardest about their second amendment are the ones that voted for this. The ones that want tyranny, because being tyrannical is OK so long as it's against those whiney losers you oppose.

The ones that want the second amendment are the ones that are so uintelligent and insecure that they need to buy a gun, or multiple guns.

My concern is that if we were to exercise our 2nd amendment rights to eliminate this totalitarian regime and then install a proper democratically-elected progressive administration, what’s to stop the Fox News types from riling up the MAGA masses into “taking back” the government and eliminating our new regime? Violence begets violence. There has to be a better way.

Please explain any reason why the parts that the regime in the US specifically detests and have stated multiple times are not true would be removed due to a "data issue".

Please explain how one can request a court apperance after being dissapeared by a paramilitary group with alegence to the regime that's better funded than the Russian millitary, when the library of Congress does not have a section on due process.

Please explain when the president declares that the country is being invaded and anyone he deems subversive is now labeled a terrorist enemy of the state, how one can request their rights when the parts of the Constitution no longer say that only Congress has the power to say the country is being invaded?

This is not just some random government site. This is the library of Congress. This is the first result of the word "Constitution" on every major internet search engine.

This is not a slippery slope, this is a drop into a camouflaged pitfall onto sharpened stakes covered in shit.

This was a test to see if we would notice, if we would care or be indifferent, if we would speak up.

I doubt there will be a formal explanation or investigation that will explain any of this to any degree out side of "opps, it was just a technical error" as if it could be an honest mistake to delete specific parts of a document which never has anything ever removed from it, only ever amended.

This isn't about making it harder to access your rights. It's signalling what rights you've lost. Who can advocate for your freedoms when the highest courts follow this new doctrine?