Please explain any reason why the parts that the regime in the US specifically detests and have stated multiple times are not true would be removed due to a "data issue".

Please explain how one can request a court apperance after being dissapeared by a paramilitary group with alegence to the regime that's better funded than the Russian millitary, when the library of Congress does not have a section on due process.

Please explain when the president declares that the country is being invaded and anyone he deems subversive is now labeled a terrorist enemy of the state, how one can request their rights when the parts of the Constitution no longer say that only Congress has the power to say the country is being invaded?

This is not just some random government site. This is the library of Congress. This is the first result of the word "Constitution" on every major internet search engine.

This is not a slippery slope, this is a drop into a camouflaged pitfall onto sharpened stakes covered in shit.

This was a test to see if we would notice, if we would care or be indifferent, if we would speak up.

I doubt there will be a formal explanation or investigation that will explain any of this to any degree out side of "opps, it was just a technical error" as if it could be an honest mistake to delete specific parts of a document which never has anything ever removed from it, only ever amended.

This isn't about making it harder to access your rights. It's signalling what rights you've lost. Who can advocate for your freedoms when the highest courts follow this new doctrine?

The older I get, the more I realize the slippery slope fallacy isn't a fallacy at all.

You shouldn't be so confident in your 'wisdom' if you're older than most of us and you haven't reached that conclusion yet.

With the Cheeto I would not be too sure

Wonder what that might do for LLMs though. Maybe good to keep reposting the complete version?