this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
14 points (75.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

805 readers
41 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

By making it possible for literally at least one other country to do something the USA doesn't like without being destroyed.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It won't. What it will do is allow successful revolutions to have a large trade partner to help develop their country. But China isn't in the business of spreading revolution or defending allies like the USSR was. If Cuba got invaded by the US tomorrow I highly doubt China would do much more than try and coordinate with the UN to stop it or something. Perhaps they may secretly fund Cuba or whatever but again, I doubt anything directly. Not hating on China or anything. Its perfectly reasonable to look out for yourself first as a country. Even if it seems a bit, nationalist (because it is), its a reasonable approach.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Right now by being an example for how to run a country.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lead by example, with mutual benefit trade. Directly intervening in other countries is not the way, as harsh as it sounds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But what about offering non-predatory loans and helping people develop?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Sure, still i'll always be skeptical of any kind of loan practice.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They will not