586
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago

sure, until his momentum hits a very large, orange, fascist wall. let's hope that doesn't happen.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

He needs to have the most supporters possible to help fight that obstacle.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I feel like that one's expected and therefore not the biggest threat. Everyone knows what the biggest threat is but only that it's spineless and makes no sense, so good luck planning ahead for it. Numbers should help, but have seem meaningless in the past.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I guess the biggest threat are the neo liberals running the party.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Yes so New Yorkers need to get out there and raise hell if Trump even so much as tries to touch Mamdani. Fail to do that and democracy is well and truly dead.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

absolutely raise hell. nobody should be quiet in the face of tyranny. however, i believe democracy in the US has been dead for quite some time.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Having Mamdani on ballot is a sign of a sliver of hope, of whatever life left in democracy. If you wish to make this ember into a fire, everyone needs to get out and vote. Show that having a worthy candidate will make people come out and vote. Show dems that with the right policy they can win, but only if they would listen.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

They know, and consider that a threat.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Hey so let’s not go ham on the pessimism just yet. There’s a lot of things that can go wrong in a lot of places, yes, but we’re seeing a lot of good things so far. Let’s not assume he and the movement he’s starting is gonna fail a priori.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

sure, but may i point out you are telling me to "not go ham on the pessimism" during modern American fascism spearheaded by a would-be dictator who has a hardon for deporting legal brown citizens and SCOTUS is fine with it

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Dude I’m right there with you. It’s dire. But refusing optimism when it’s reasonable only just hurts morale. This is reasonable.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

i’m not refusing, i promise. i won’t reject optimism—i am, however, going to constantly remind people how difficult this is going to be because not even half of Americans understand the basics of fascism. we are in deep and the legal routes are gone. i want the stark reality to be felt and understood.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 18 hours ago

It’s almost like someone needs to do something about that wall. But by all means, keep waiting for someone to come save you.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

i hear ya.. i do. i am unfortunately personally unable to do the deed.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Depends on the size of the wave behind him. Studies have shown a wall alone isn't as effective at stopping large waves. Now when there are effective and thought out breakers further out, the wave tends to have little effect.

Thankfully, this administration is incompetent. Problem though is the amount of resources they have and a Democratic, and Nationwide resistance, that can't stop eating their boots for failure of any true effectiveness.

We need a leader. Just like the Republicans, we need a person, or person, we can rally behind. Figureheads that stand as tall as Trump. Until then, what we have are several broken fronts working loosely together against a larger, [mostly] coordinated force.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

Fucking love this polling. The only shot the establishment has is either Adams or Cuomo dropping out and endorsing the other. Cuomo won't quit because he's a sociopathic narcissist. Adams can't quit because if he can't do Trump's bidding in NYC, Trump will probably prosecute him for corruption (and he is very guilty of corruption). Throw Silwa into the mix and the moderates will have to choose between two corrupt megalomaniacs and a weirdo in a beret, while anyone remotely progressive will gravitate towards Mamdani.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

I vote for Not Sure. He's the smartest man in the world.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

So...Socrates?

[-] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Also to note for others: NYC only has ranked choice for mayor in primaries (or special elections), so there is no ranked choice in this general election

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago

The only ones that don’t want Mamdani in Gracie Mansion are the rich fuckers ruining the city. There are many many many more working class people in NYC than rich fuckers.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Wow, I am finally glad that the worst people in the world telling you not to support them, even if some of those evil assholes are Democrats, has stopped working.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago
[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Somebody surly has come up with the right slogan

You don't mess with the Zohran!

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Zohran the Destroyer!

Or whatever label his opponents came up with that make him sound badass

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

"You too!"

Tap for spoilerfake headline duh

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Keep it up!

[-] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

fuck off newsweek with your clickbait bullshit, such a garbage outlet...

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago

That’s why they got that cunt cuomo to run independent.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

Honestly at this point, because of first past the post, this probably splits the establishment vote. Which I personally think is hilarious (ranked choice being implemented would be better, of course).

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Yeah, because the Dems have been keeping him in news cycle after news cycle by attacking him so he can spread his policy ideas.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Maybe the real progressives were the Democrats we made along the way.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 21 hours ago

yeah, I've read these stories countless times and the outcome has always been the same. In all honesty I think they do more harm than good. It gets it into the morons heads "oh, he's going to win, I can stay home".

[-] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

Mr. Mamdani, your campaign seems to have the momentum of a runaway freight train. Why are you so popular?

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
586 points (99.2% liked)

politics

24776 readers
2976 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS