144
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Money on the fact she probably found his Grindr account

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

"Biblical grounds."

If there was a God, Paxton would have been struck by lightning a long time ago.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The headline makes it sound like she just discovered that he's actually a swarm of locusts in a trenchcoat or something. I mean, that would explain a lot, but still

[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago

If his wife wasn’t a state senator; I would not think the following. However, something is smelling foul here…

Ken Paxton nearly gets removed from office by the GOP dominated state legislature and barely comes out victorious against them. What does Paxton do? Run a canpaign for US senate against John Cornyn to primary him and paint him as a “RINO”, like he did against many that voted for his impeachment. Who is polling higher right now? PAXTON.

What happens if Paxton wins the primary against Cornyn? Texas becomes a COMPETATIVE STATE for the 2026 midterms. So how can the Texas GOP completely kneecap Paxton’s popularity with republican voters? Oh, just convince his wife to divorce him to try to tank his campaign. Paint him as an “anti-christian” to convince the christians.

So what I’m saying is that this is a Texas GOP lead conspiracy to try to tank Ken Paxton’s senate primary bid. As him becoming the nominee would put control of the US senate in play (potentially).

Or he could be a misogynistic twat who believes women are property and would strangle his kids of they were lgbt+. It could be that too.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

It is infinitely more likely that the stress of the campaign trail, opportunities to cheat, and competing demands of their separate ambitions would bring a couple to the brink of divorce than... this suggestion.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

What happens if Paxton wins the primary against Cornyn? Texas becomes a COMPETATIVE STATE for the 2026 midterms.

I don't understand why Texas would become competitive.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

I think they are implying that the far-right Paxton would mobilize left-wing voters more than the not-quite-so-far-right Cornyn.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Hell, could be both.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago

“Today, after 38 years of marriage, I filed for divorce on biblical grounds,” Angela Paxton posted on X. “I believe marriage is a sacred covenant and I have earnestly pursued reconciliation. But in light of recent discoveries, I do not believe that it honors God or is loving to myself, my children, or Ken to remain in the marriage.

“I move forward with complete confidence that God is always working everything together for the good of those who love Him and who are called according to His purpose,” she wrote.

God says no divorces...

Henry the 8th was the one that said divorces were cool with God, probably because it was starting to look bad how many wives he was executing

[-] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago

God said no such thing.

The Roman Catholic Popes and cardinals are the ones who said "no divorce."

When Moses wrote down the law, the rule was was "ok, divorce if you must."

According to the Gospels, Jesus (God) appropriately said "divorce is bad, and leaving your wife for a younger model is just adultery with extra steps."

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=matthew+19&version=NIV

(Matthew 19, the aforementioned gospel.)

https://www.insight.org/resources/article-library/individual/what-did-jesus-say-about-divorce

(A Texas pastor opining on the topic. A bit too anti-sex for my taste, but a fair sample of Texas conservative Christendom.)

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

First was divorced actually. The 2nd was accused of some weird shit, she was beheaded.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Technically annulled, but you were still way closer than I was going off memory:

Possibly pressured somewhat by Catherine’s nephew, the Holy Roman Emperor Charles V, the Pope refused. In response the king assumed supremacy over religious matters and turned his back on the Catholic Church.

Henry’s marriage to Catherine was eventually annulled on 1533 and Catherine was banished from court as Dowager Princess of Wales. She lived out the rest of her days at Kimbolton Castle in Cambridgeshire where she died in 1536. Her daughter Mary was forbidden for visiting her or to attending her funeral at Peterborough Cathedral.

https://www.historyhit.com/the-6-wives-of-henry-viii-in-order/

[-] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago

Look up the word corrupt in the dictionary and it's just a picture of Ken Paxton

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Also listed under the definition of, Horror and Nightmare. Just a helpful cross reference.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

She stuck with him through the corruption and the cheating.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

That's personal. Why politicize it?

Hot take, I know.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Because it’s probably lies. Something else is going on I mean, they’ve been together for a long time and scratched each others political backs. He helped to get her a seat in the Senate so they could continue helping each other politically. And only now she’s going to divorce him? I doubt it has anything to do with him cheating on her. Read her Wikipedia entry for fun stuff like…

“In February 2019, Paxton introduced Senate Bill 860, which would grant her husband the power to issue exemptions from securities regulations.”

“When Paxton declined to recuse herself from the trial, she was barred by the Texas Senate from voting on her husband's impeachment.”

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
144 points (97.4% liked)

politics

24733 readers
2771 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS