all 28 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 26 points 2 years ago (1 child)

All western politicians holding office should be forced to watch an hour of YouTube China infrastructure porn every day until they produce YouTube infrastructure porn videos that get more views and likes than China’s. You can adjust it per-capita if you want to make it easy for them.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Western politician proceeds to start posting actual porn

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Like when Ted Cruz liked incest porn on a Twitter account

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Recently saw a wee story about a candidate for Virginia parliament who is selling homemade porn of herself online. So I was very much not exaggerating

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago

    xi-plz

    heart-sickle

    western nuke bros cope

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I hope they have a good plan for the resulting high-level nuclear waste. Knowing China, they probably have, but reporting on that is unfortunately very minimal.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 years ago

    Niger likes this

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Beijing had set a target for 58GW of installed nuclear capacity by 2020, but as of September 2023 is just short of this with a combined installed capacity of 57GW, and 24 units under construction with a total installed capacity of 27.8GW, according to CNEA.

    So every unit is a little over one GW? Sounds good, but their plans is to only have 18% nuclear by 2060, so it seems that won't be their most important electricity source.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Here's the energy mix China's planning on by 2060, nuclear is around 19% so looks like it's roughly on target https://www.visualcapitalist.com/chinas-energy-transition-in-5-charts/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    I had thought that China was expected to abandon fossil fuels by 2060, but 14% of the total energy will still be derived from fossil fuels. Maybe that is a more realistic outlook on things, though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    2060 is their net zero target. 10 years behind the West, but I'm incredibly confident that one of those is just tortured numbers with carbon offsets like buying trees that will never be cut down. I'll let you guess which

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Does anyone know if China makes their own nuclear fuel? Or do they buy it places? I don't mean raw uranium, I mean fuel-ready stuff, as AFAIK only Rosatom and Westinghouse have the technology for that

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • [–] [S] 22 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    In addition China is also started building thorium reactors for which they have significant reserves of fuel domestically. The other advantage of thorium is that it uses molten salt for cooling, so the reactor doesn't need to be built next to a large body of water. They're also safer because once the reactor shuts down, salt will turn into solid and you don't have to worry about radioactive leaks.

    https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3224183/china-gives-green-light-nuclear-reactor-burns-thorium-fuel-could-power-country-20000-years

    @Shrike502@lemmygrad.ml

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Finally! Mothereffin Thorium reactors!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 21 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's kind of funny how these could've been made decades ago, but nobody cared to because thorium can't be used for nuclear weapons. So everybody would rather just mine uranium since it's dual use.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments