694
submitted 2 years ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 108 points 2 years ago

...aaaand across the line.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 31 points 2 years ago

He’s been in many great films and tv shows but that curve is what I’ll always remember him for

[-] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

Same. I would imagine the trio will be heartbroken today.

[-] Usernamealreadyinuse@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] SilentSeven@lemmy.world 56 points 2 years ago

Of motorsport fame as well.....namesake of Top Gear's Gambon corner!

[-] rafadavidc@ttrpg.network 12 points 2 years ago

corner

Thank you, ctrl+f did not fail me today.

[-] Starb3an@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

That was my immediate thought

[-] instamat@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago

This is the second actor that’s died after playing dumbledore. The only conclusion is the part is cursed.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 12 points 2 years ago

Yes. It is cursed with old age.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] axellenium@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago

I also fondly remember his performance in Toys (1992) with Robin Williams. Such a great actor, RIP General Zevo

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

I love him in that film. I showed it to my daughter last year and it holds up.

[-] axellenium@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

The soundtrack is also exquisite

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] crypticthree@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

There had to be a better picture

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 61 points 2 years ago

Honestly? Not really. He did not age well. But it was part of his charm. Why should only attractive people have lead roles?

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

i mean is anyone that old attractive per se? he looks like a grizzled european, not necessarily bad

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Anomalous_Llama@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Didn’t age well? Bruv you should see the people in my family in their 80’s. Motherfuckers look ROUGH

Michael looks old but not bad

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 3 points 2 years ago

I mean they didn't have to use one of him in his last few years.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 24 points 2 years ago

He was in the best Doctor Who Christmas Special

[-] ech@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Smith seriously had the best specials, and A Christmas Carol is so great. Gambon did a fantastic job in the episode.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

And he was so much better there than in Harry Potter too. Either he didn't like that role or he got bad direction.

[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Rest in peace.

Growing up, I loved the Harry Potter movies. I really, really did.

But part of growing older is realizing that I didn't like Harry Potter as much as I use to.

All good things will unfortunately come to an end one day, but there's not a set ending to our stories yet.

We should make the best of the time we have here.

[-] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago

The Potterverse (shoot me) suffers from the same problem as Star Wars: an overzealous creator who, as it turns out, probably just got lucky the first time around and is doing their best to sully any good memories people may have of the franchise.

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He was amazing in Gosford Park (2001). It's sad it's such a little known movie.
Michael Gambon

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I adore that film. It was the template for Downton Abbey, created by the writer of Gosford Park.

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Julian Fellowes!

[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It’s strange that it’s not as well known given that it was Julian Fellowes’ proto-Downton Abbey. It’s one of my favorite movies of all time and it’s like a who’s-who of the best of British actors.

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

The cast is absolute dynamite. It's one of my vary favorite as well.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It's weird, I thought there were a ton of great performances in that movie, and yet I really didn't like it at all. I've even watched it twice because I thought maybe I missed something the first time, but nope.

He's terrific in it though.

[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

It does have a weird vibe to it, I'll admit. I do love it myself though.

[-] Tatters@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It goes against the usual, overly romanticised trope for Country House dramas, to be much more gritty and seedy. I like it. Lots of cameos too, a real ensemble piece.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] specseaweed@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

I know its way down the list of his credits, but i thought he was amazing in Layer Cake.

[-] Hiuhokiguess@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago

Me and my friend quote the shit out of Eddie Temple all the time.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I'm not a Harry Potter fan, but he was amazing in the BBC TV series "The Singing Detective," later turned into a very disappointing Robert Downey, Jr. film.

EDIT: Another great performance he gave was in the miniseries "Longitude," about clockmaker John Harrison's amazing contribution to the world.

[-] systemguy_64@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

At least this Dumbledore made it through the rest of the movies (>!until Snape got to him!<)

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Psst, your spoiler didn't work.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] moipe@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Uh oh, Jude Law, you're next!

[-] ZenkorSoraz@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago

He reaches Kings Cross Station

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dadifer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

It's like experiencing it all over again :(

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Pretty sure Dumbledore was not Michael Gambon's defining work. I remember one time he did a thing where it was just him with a fixed camera and facial expressions, he actually made it work. RIP.

[-] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Pretty sure Dumbledore was not Michael Gambon’s defining work.

I agree, but unfortunately these articles usually choose the most recent and/or widely known work to mention in the headline even if it may not adequately represent the best of the person's career.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Damn, I was literally just having a conversation about Michael Gambon yesterday. Spooky. RIP.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
694 points (97.8% liked)

News

35749 readers
2596 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS