1388
submitted 23 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 103 points 22 hours ago

So does not allowing food companies to sprinkle lead and uranium in food. What's the point?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 78 points 22 hours ago

Ah, the propaganda war has started.

[-] [email protected] 44 points 22 hours ago

That's good news. Means the initiative has a shot.

It was disquieting back when they were just flat out ignoring it.

[-] [email protected] 22 points 22 hours ago

They were probably thinking that by openly opposing it before it collected enough signatures, they would have given it more publicity and hence made more people sign it.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 18 hours ago

Yes, it curtails you from making absurd choices about how to fuck customers out of the money they paid for your games

[-] [email protected] 19 points 18 hours ago

Yeah, because the choices they have now is working great for quality games...

[-] [email protected] 30 points 20 hours ago

Fuck developer choice! What about my choice as a consumer?

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] [email protected] 61 points 22 hours ago

Corporate jargon translation:

"It's going to limit innovation" = "We won't be able to use those new ways of ripping off our customers anymore"

[-] [email protected] 15 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Backpedaling to "defending creators" - that's a bold move, Cotton.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 20 hours ago

Keep signing it! Don't stop!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 13 hours ago

All games become subscription only in 3..2..

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 47 points 22 hours ago

"Developers" are the ones who are passionate about the games they make, and definitely don't want their games dead.

"Corporations" are the ones who only want to profit from selling the game, and then ditch it once it's no longer lucrative enough.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

We saw the depths a nepo baby from Blizzard would go to for this initiative to fail, can't imagine what could happen with a body comprised of people from the biggest worms in the industry (Epic, EA, Activision, Microsoft, Ubi et al.)

[-] [email protected] 26 points 22 hours ago

Choice to do what?

These are their two points:

Private servers are not always a viable alternative option for players as the protections we put in place to secure players’ data, remove illegal content, and combat unsafe community content would not exist and would leave rights holders liable. In addition, many titles are designed from the ground-up to be online-only; in effect, these proposals would curtail developer choice by making these video games prohibitively expensive to create.

I feel like the first is fair enough at the moment, but with accompanying laws it could be resolved. Eg once a developer enacts an end of life plan, their legal culpability is removed. Plus give the right tools for moderation and the community can take care of it.

Second is just a cop out I think. "Many titles are designed from the ground up to be online only" - that's the whole point. It's not retroactive, so you don't need to redesign an existing game. But going forward you would need to plan for the eventual end of life. Developers have chimed in that it can be done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 20 hours ago

Good. Your choices are bad

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
1388 points (98.7% liked)

Games

40403 readers
3160 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS