89
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

TL;DW:

  • Check the "residual noise"
  • Parallel lines should converge to a single point (vanishing point)
  • Connect shadows to what casts them, extend the lines, they should meet at the light source
[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

9:39 "Please understand that social media is not a place to get news and information."

Now I don't know what to think about this video I just watched on social media.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Sometimes you have to use the tools of the enemy to defeat the enemy. 🤗

[-] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

I've just modified my thought process to not believe any photos any more. Only my Mark I eyeballs are trustworthy to me now.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Can't even trust my lying eyeballs...

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Dude, in the future, let's say if there's a scandal, we won't even know if it's real or not, because AI can easily generate a video that's indistinguishable from reality, showing the beneficial truth. You've heard of Veo3, right? I think it will be fun :3

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Not only will it create fake video and photos and articles, but it will also create fake comments, websites to back up the fake, and other articles leaching off of the original fake.

Digital media will become so unreliable that information itself will be at risk of being too untrustworthy to use or share.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Yeah, that's why it's better now to find reliable people from different parts of the world and tell each other what's really going on, otherwise I think you know... :3

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As opposed to real AI photos?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

As opposed to fake photoshopped photos, I suppose?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

As opposed to real photoshopped photos?

Edit:/j

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fair point, but many photos are not edited to the point of fundamentally changing them. I wouldn't call a touched up wedding photo a "fake".

edit: I guess I was distracting from the point. Yes, "AI" already implies "fake". Guess if someone were to look for "how to spot fake photos" this would help them find this video?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Totes, I wouldn't either haha.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

"real" photoshopped photos don't typically add things that aren't there, they just modify things that are.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 15 hours ago

just ask chatgpt bruh

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I just act as if every photo is man made, that way I don't accidentally shit on a real artist by falsely calling their work AI.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I don't even know, in that case, to know for sure, you would have to know the person personally to know for sure or trust them, lol.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I can't tell if a work is AI generated, so, if someone posts something and they are genuine, I just trust them at their word. I'd rather call 10 AI art pieces good than calling a human made art piece bad.

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
89 points (93.2% liked)

Fuck AI

3376 readers
2084 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS