this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
96 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3814 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

American Conservatives: "Wait, we're supposed to vilify Nazis? What if they are your base voting block, though?"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I’d like to see the mental gymnastics that will somehow make this Biden’s fault.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

He didn't stop it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I could have sworn I’d seen this in a tv show or a comedy sketch.. like they invite some old veteran to speak about his life at some event only to realize halfway through that he was a nazi

Does anyone remember something like this?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That sounds vaguely like an It's Always Sunny episode where Dennis and Dee find out their grandfather wasn't just a WW2 vet, but an actual Nazi.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe it’s just me, but I found the article a bit confusing trying to figure out who this Yaroslav Hunka character is and his relationship to Zelensky/Ukraine.

He's a 98-year-old Ukrainian Canadian, who served in the Nazi SS Galizien formation during the Second World War

That’s gonna be a big YIKES from me, dawg… 😬

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Honestly he's not related. Someone simply wanted an old Ukrainian (war vet preferred) for them to parade around when Zelensky came to visit to show they have been friends forever and take good care of Ukrainians in Canada.... but apparently people didn't do their homework very hard and their simple easy win that would be a 3 minute thing ended up being a lot bigger.

So stupid.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And honestly, they really did Zelensky a disservice here. Of course detractors are going to run with the headline "Zelensky salutes Waffen-SS Nazi". Grist for russian trolls' mills.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

Oh absolutely!

It could be looked at as some great conspiracy to hurt Zelensky and give credit to the rumor that he is a Nazi, and all most likely cause some intern just typed in basic search terms when trying to find their photo op puppet....

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's insane to me nobody questioned this given the historical context and that no alarm bells went off in the whole process, the whole House just unanimously clapped after learning this guy fought for Ukraine in WW2. Like the absolute best case is basically that the person only cared about Ukrainian Independence against the Soviets and begrudgingly accepted Hitler's help, that's not something that deserves honor or recognition for obvious reasons, and that's the best case. These units committed atrocities and it shows how stupid our government is when they seem to be completely ignorant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, I see how my comment is worded as though I was potentially trying to tie this guy to Zelensky. I understood they weren’t “related“, but I didn’t understand the Ukrainian context of the old Nazi guy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Zelenskyy visited Canada and was speaking to the House of Commons beside the Prime Minister while this old Nazi was recognized and honored by the entire house.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Oh, I totally got it now, but I appreciate the clarification all the same!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Step 1: Don't invite Nazi collaborators to your party. Step 2: Enjoy party. Step 3. Save job

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The right decision.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Conservative leader, Pierre Poilievre, also criticized Justin Trudeau for the fiasco, saying the prime minister had “brought shame on Canada” after the government’s failure to have its “massive diplomatic and intelligence apparatus vet and prevent honouring a Nazi”.

The Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies said that the division “was responsible for the mass murder of innocent civilians with a level of brutality and malice that is unimaginable.”

The prime minister’s office said there was no advance notice Hunka would attend Friday’s session of parliament because he was a guest of the speaker and the list of attendees is not shared.

The political commentator David Moscrop posted a picture of Rota and a head of lettuce, a nod to the final, embattled days of the former UK prime minister Liz Truss.

“In view of the scandalous events in the Canadian Parliament, which involved honouring, in the presence of President Zelenskiy, a member of the criminal Nazi SS Galizien formation, I have taken steps towards the possible extradition of this man to Poland,” Przemysław Czarnek said in a social media post on Tuesday.

Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center said in a statement the event had also “handed a propaganda victory to Russia, distracting from what was a momentously significant display of unity between Canada and Ukraine”.


The original article contains 596 words, the summary contains 218 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Well, that was inevitable.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Canadian Parliament, always fucking worrying about every other country BUT Canada. Pulling this political theater bullshit, instead of legislating shit that will actually help Canadians. The Canadian government is all about foreign affairs and not actually governing Canada.