This was inevitable given the economics of cheap missile vs expensive anti-missile missile, especially if/when it takes multiple interceptors to take down one incoming missile. Bespoke wunderweapons are more or less fine and good if you get to use them in limited or relatively controlled circumstances (ex defending against smaller barrages from Gaza/Lebanon) but the second they're faced with significant opposition from a peer enemy then you find out why quantity has a quality all of it's own
post
IF I were China I'd Be sending so very very many Machine Parts to Iran rn. And if I were Iran I'd be keeping my hypersonic powder dry and launching a steady stream of shit tier drones.
Drones don't get close enough (or fly high enough) to trigger inceptors, but they DO get the entity's fighter jets (that take 4-12 man hours to maintain per hour of flight) to scramble.
We know this to be true because we know the US has very low production capacity for these types of missiles, and a large chunk of them have already been spent in Ukraine. Each attempt at an intercept requires 2-4 missiles to be launched, and Iran has been pounding Israel with hundreds of missiles for around a week now. The math does not work for Israel here.
I think the real ploy behind the scenes is much more akin to nuclear blackmail. I think Netanyahu is telling Trump, "we need to destroy these deeply buried enrichment sites. Either the US help us and use your bunker buster bombs, or Israel will be forced to use its nukes to take them out."
this with the shipments from the US directly before they decided to launch their attack? color me surprised.



all 24 comments