337
Good opportunity for Walz to say, "fuck no I don't want to talk to the guy whose rhetoric instigated this."
Walz to his secretary: “Tell him I’m not here right now”
Tell him I'll call him back on February 31st.
Why does Trump need to call Walz? It's obvious they're not going to be on the same page about this or cooperate. The call would just be a waste of both their time.
He is afraid of Walz
Listen, I'm a piece of shit criminal with credible evidence of sexually assaulting 28 women. Why would you expect me to act like a decent human being?
They're all going out of their way to blame the assassination on Waltz, of all people.
Not the republican that did it.
Ah, the irony.
The projection.
What? Because that guy only killed two Democrats, or what?
Who gives a shit what Trump says?
TACO bout your own circus, you fucking clown.
Don't bother: Walz has enough on his mind.
Yeah, he should've been there to shoot that man! What a loser!
If only there was a good guy with a gun to save the day.
\s
Funny how there's almost never a good guy with a gun, like statistically almost never. There was that cowboy that shot an active shooter in a church, and I'll give props to the guy the ran into Uvalde when the uniformed bad guys were too chicken shit to save kids lives, and just hung outside. I can't think of any off the top of my head, although I know they exist, but I could prattle off at least a dozen high profile shootings.
There was one just this weekend. A guy with a rifle popped up at a Utah No Kings rally. Two people who were on hand to protect the protesters stopped what would have almost certainly been a mass casualty event.
Sadly, an innocent bystander was killed by the defenders. And that is the real issue. Guns are extremely dangerous even when used properly. Even good guys with a gun are not perfect and innocent people are often injured or killed on accident. We have too many guns in this country and not enough regulation and enforcement.
Even in this case, it wasn't the random "good guy with a gun". It was a member of the peacekeeping group setup by the event organizers. IE, it was their job.
There was that guy in colorado who shot a mass shooter, then the cops killed him
Oof. Double dipping on the baddies with guns on that one.
Last stat I saw was 1in 7000, but that includes cases with collateral damage.
So, for America, that's like once a year.
Usually the good guys with guns are militia or are shot by the cops. A damned fine example I know of happened after WW2 where when a bunch of men got back to their home county they basically had to form a militia to expel the corrupt sheriff who was doing shit like ballot stuffing. Spoiler the sheriff and his mafia goons didn't stand a chance against men who just got done fighting the Imperial Japanese and Nazi Germany.
Where did this happen?
I think it was in Athens McMinn county Tennessee, specifically Athens Tennessee.
It sounds like an interesting story, kind of a Walking Tall kind of thing.
This is sooo false it's not even funny. There are way more DGUs than there are not.
And like it or not most mass shootings are stopped by someone with a firearm.
There are way more DGUs than there are not.
I think this is a pretty gigantic citation needed here. I couldn't find anything supporting this assertion but plenty of material showing the opposite.
Before the CDC took it off the site, they had reference to an estimated 500-2.5mil DGUs a year. DGUs are hard to estimate because a dgu can be as simple as presenting the firearm to a would be attacker and the attacker leaving the victim(s) alone. Most people don't call the police because of this.
DGU. I didn't know they invented an initialism at the rallies.
most mass shootings are stopped by
..the perp taking his own life.
…the perp taking his own life.
Well, technically, that is someone with a firearm I suppose...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defensive_gun_use
It's literally a term.
And no it's not.
You stay unarmed while fascist are roaming the street.
What a fucking piece of shit.
this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
337 points (97.7% liked)
politics
24190 readers
2944 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS