this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
868 points (96.1% liked)

politics

18894 readers
4274 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has spoken out after video emerged appearing to show House Republican Lauren Boebert engaging in what the New York congresswoman described as "sexually lewd acts" in a Colorado theater on September 10.

Boebert and a male companion were thrown out of the Buell Theatre in Denver after repeatedly vaping, using a cell phone and "causing a disturbance" during a performance of musical Beetlejuice.

Surveillance footage from inside the theater appeared to show Boebert's male accomplice groping her breasts, and then being groped in turn by the Republican firebrand. In a statement, Boebert apologized for her behavior, which she claimed "fell short of my values," but made no reference to the alleged sexual acts.

Ocasio-Cortez responded to the controversy in a one-minute video posted to her 323,000 TikTok followers on Thursday, in response to a viewer's question.

She commented: "All I gotta say is I can't go out to lunch in Florida in my free time, not doing anything, just eating outside and it's wall-to-wall Fox News coverage and then you have a member of Congress engaging is sexually lewd acts in a public theater and they got nothing to say.”

"I danced to Phoenix once in college and it was like all over the place. But putting on a whole show of their own at Beetlejuice and there's nothing? I'm just saying be consistent. That's all I'm asking for. Equal treatment. I don't expect it, but come on."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 198 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Living has gotta be tough when you know Ben Shapiro is updating your Wikifeet entry daily. Keep up the good work AOC. One day Ben will be gone and you'll be able to wear strappy shoes and sandals in peace once again.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Wikifeet is...real? Yup, we don't deserve the internet. Or earth.

Also, why are the feet fetishists some of the creepiest? I don't like kink shaming but why are they so weird?

[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

Dude, how long have you been online if wikifeet is what you think puts us over the edge of deserving internet?

You could honesty find at least 300 more taboo fetishes in under an hour without even getting into the dark web.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The tabooness of the fetish isn't what he's talking about but rather the personality of the person with the fetish.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

It's one thing to have weird kinks, it's another to be including non-consenting strangers into it

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My theory is that some of the men who really enjoy sucking girls' big toe are sublimating their desire to show oral affection to an entirely kind of blunt roughly thumb-thickness object.

I am talking, of course, about cigars.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it is as real as you suggest, they really missed an opportunity to call it "Wikifeetia"

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 162 points 1 year ago (42 children)

I love her, downvote me if you must.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Say what you will about pronouns, sometimes they aren't clear.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Wait, what? I've just reread my comment like 50 times trying to figure out what you mean.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Her" could refer to AOC or Boebert. It is technically unclear.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

lotta people are going to be real mad about their upvotes when op follows up with "...and that's why Lauren Boebert is great" or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are you referring to Boobert or AOC?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (41 replies)
[–] [email protected] 120 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember how much pearl-clutching there was over AOC. Dancing. In college. Oh, the horror! Imagine it! Dancing! All of a sudden every con became a town elder with a stick wedged in their posterior in the movie Footloose.

(By the way - I love to use those gifs of her dancing when replying to cons when the discussion is AOC.)

And now that Qbert is caught in a grope session, with children present, the cons seem to be mum. Weird.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AOC dancing in college, Vivek Ramaswamy rapping to Eminem like 2 weeks ago.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Shaka, when the walls fell.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Do they really have to say alleged sex acts? I mean, there's video. Are they suggesting that maybe the groping and fondling wasn't sexual in nature?

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (6 children)

You’re right, the uh “activity” was definitely getting her boobs groped and flashed about- and giving a handy in return (both of which looked incredibly uncomfortable, just saying.)

That said, what the video shows is a crime, and there’s fairly strict ways they can write about potential criminals which more or less mandate tacking on qualifiers- like “allegedly”, at least until they can tack on the “convicted” qualifier.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A journalistic org will always say alleged until someone is convicted, even if the crime is "obvious"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Thats a good point. She already apologized for getting caught as well. I think at this point its "verified exhibitionist sex acts"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe she was vigorously trying to get a stain ~~in~~ off his pants...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe she lost a popcorn down in her titties and he was helping get it out. And to thank him she... gave him an OTPHJ? I got nothin'.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

gave him an OTPHJ? I got nothin'.

The kids are now referring to that as a Boebert.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Obviously she's completely correct. But she should realize at this point that it's a waste of time to ever expect conservatives to be consistent. It's not in their nature.

[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, but that's also where it's up to us to help call it out.

AOC's fighting exactly our fight, and the minute we get complacent, I say that's where we suck.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Right. Use these kind of hypocritical acts as ammunition with conservative supporters. They'll fight you. They'll get angry and defensive. They'll say it's not the same.

Don't let them get away with it. It is the same. Just keep saying that. Call them delusional. Call them out of touch.

Embarras the fuck out of them. They might not change their minds, but they will shut the fuck up and maybe even have second thoughts when voting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago

She literally said “I don’t expect it.”

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (2 children)

God wants you to feel up people in public places, clearly.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why he gave us 10 fingers and only two legs (obviously dancing is less important).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The article really is just about how she responded to a thing. Not even mentioning in title if she did it in a noteworthy way or anything, just that she responded. Amazing

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Didn't those weirdos also go on about AOC's boyfriends feet at some point? The right wing media and the GQP have absolutely no substance. Their whole existence is a huge drain on our society.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I wish we had an AOC in the UK

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I wish we had NHS in the U.S.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wish becoming a billionaire made your head pop like a party balloon releasing glitter and little "Winner!" paper notes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

The lady has a point.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

AOC has a point. There is a double standard here.

load more comments
view more: next ›