I'm from Mexico, and the most used chat application is WhatsApp. It's used for EVERYTHING. I use Telegram only for contacting my family members (both my parents and my brother). They also use it only for this family chat. All my (and their) contacts use WhatsApp instead.

Now with the news that Telegram will collaborate with Twitter, I feel that I should delete it. Not that Zuck is any better than Musk, but still...

Also I don't think it's worth the effort to teach my parents yet another messaging app, like signal.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 95 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Collaborating with Xitter is not the most distasteful thing Telegram has done. Its marketing model has been to consistently lie to people about being encrypted when that's only true in very limited cases. It has also catered to criminals by attempting to make it difficult to comply with legal demands for information, while holding that information for its own purposes.

Signal, on the other hand is always encrypted and does its best to hold as little information about users as possible.

Also I don’t think it’s worth the effort to teach my parents yet another messaging app, like signal.

What is there to learn? Every popular messaging app has pretty much the same UI.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Isn't it good for a communication company to be noncompliant with people's conversations?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Being unable to comply (signal) and selectively refusing to comply while still having access to the data (telegram) is not equivalent

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    "Selectively" is a new word that wasn't mentioned in the post I replied to. I get that it's better to not have access to the data at all, and lying to customers is shitty, etc. I use signal and not telegram. But 'refusing to comply with demands from other groups for data access is correct behavior' was my only argument. Nothing about equivalence

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    It usually wasn't conversations that were at issue. People would engage in criminals acts, such as trading child sexual abuse media in large unencrypted group chats. Law enforcement would find links to those chats, join them, and observe criminal acts, leading to court orders to Telegram to disclose whatever identifying information it had about the offenders, such as phone numbers and IP addresses.

    Telegram intentionally split storage of that kind of information across jurisdictions that do not cooperate so that it was effectively impossible to obtain orders for all of them. They bragged their marketing materials that they have never complied with a court order for user information. Taken as a whole, I see that as intentionally facilitating child abuse.

    Signal's approach is pretty much the inverse; rather than hoard data about users and shield people they know have done evil, Signal has ensured that it does not know the contents of any conversation, nor anything about users other than when they created the account and most recently accessed it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 41 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    there's no learning curve with Signal, it's almost exactly like whatsapp.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 37 points 1 year ago

    Can you use signal?

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I'd take Telegram over WhatsApp as I find Telegram, ignoring privacy concerns, is an excellent messenger. Much better than WhatsApp

    But, Signal's pretty great.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago*

    Switch to Signal. It's not like there's anything to learn, the UI isn't all that different from WhatsApp

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Telegram was developed by Russians and HQ is in United Arab Emirates. They have always been sketchy af.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • Telegram's owners are at odds with the Russian government though, hence the move to another country.
    There's plenty of problems with Telegram without having to resort to Russophobia already.

    For example their chats aren't even E2E-encrypted by default and afaik there's no way to have encrypted group chats either.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 23 points 1 year ago

    I've heard good things about Signal, maybe try that?

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    If you get rid of Telegran, at least you'd only have one shitty messenger instead of two.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Also I don’t think it’s worth the effort to teach my parents yet another messaging app, like signal.

    My friend, just set up Signal on their phones, put it in place of the Telegram app and watch them not even notice anything changed.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    Not if they're the kind of users my parents are. An update moves a button from the bottom-left to the bottom-right and suddenly "the app you gave me is broken again".

    Also, don't sneak-change things on other people's phones.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Here’s another comment endorsing Signal.

    https://signal.org/

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I really distrust telegram. There are some many dark patterns around it and the server is closed source so I'd say the distrust is very well deserved.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    I personally avoid telegram for anything sensitive or personal. Because there is no end to end encryption. You should move to Signal.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    If you care about these things best would be to use a chat application like Jami which won't end up like WhatsApp.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Unless you wrote it yourself, never assume that an app won't inevitably enshittify itself. People thought that about Firefox, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Despite being in the hands of the zuck, whatsapp is more private and secure than telegram, and not because of any collaboration with X/twitter, it's been that way forever... so go ahead and use it (but if you can, signal is even better on that front).

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    WhatsApp is more secure by design, but one suspects that Meta is up to something. But I suppose to whatever extent it's possible to trust Meta, they are nonetheless likely a better guarantor of your security than Telegram is

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Meta don't need to see your chats to get a lot of value out of WhatsApp.

    They can see who you message (the phone number) and from there they can probably ~90% of the time identify who that person is via Facebook/Instagram databases. They can see who you message when, and how often you message them, and what time of day you send and recieve messages - all of that is very valuable to help them create an advertising profile for you.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Threema. And don’t forget, real privacy and security, with centralized services, is never free. The app is tested by third party and is open source. And, you don’t have to share your phone number, unlike with Signal.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago

    You no longer have to share your phone number in signal. They added a unique user identifier a while ago that you can share to add new contacts. This is not permanent by the way, you can change this user identifier anytime.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›