68
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago

Straight up false

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockbuster_(entertainment)

https://www.wordorigins.org/big-list-entries/blockbuster

This seems like one of those terms without any clear origin, and the Wikipedia doesn't list this potential use as one of them. I'm not saying it isn't true (I don't know), but @[email protected] you could edit the title to something like "the term 'blockbuster' may have come from". Or even just add "[disputed]" to the title

[-] [email protected] 85 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is called a "folk etymology". Great story, but completely false.

[-] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago

this article is why secondary sources (and beyond) are important.

the op is just an assertion made by cbc with no sources (credible or otherwise) whatsoever.

[-] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago

here's what it looks like when people know what they're talking about:

https://www.wordorigins.org/big-list-entries/blockbuster

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

i heard that 'Lawd' is actually an acronym that stands for 'Let's all walk dogs'! but not really, though.

[-] [email protected] 102 points 1 day ago

I always thought it was because the lines for the theater would get so long they would fill up a city block.

[-] [email protected] 94 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is. I dunno what this ice nonsense is.

edit: The actual origin of the word is referring to very large bombs in WWII, which clearly took place long after we were using blocks of ice to cool public spaces. But the modern usage in terms of movies does in fact come from the days when mega-hit movies started having lines around the block.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

AI article maybe? It's rambly and doesn't really have a point to make.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Under the Influence is Terry O'Reilly's show and he's usually really good about sourcing things. Pretty disappointing, honestly.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

maybe im wrong to, but id expect better from the CBC

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

AI articles are like Calvin Ball

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

It’s actually a reference to the blockbuster bomb.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

But if a movie bombs, that's a bad thing.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

But if that's a bomb ass movie, that's good

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

If it’s shit, that’s bad.

If it’s the shit, that’s good.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

If you’re cold as shit, that’s bad.

If you’re shit hot, that’s good.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The first use of the word in the media was for a war movie.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

I had thought it was a reference to a bomb.

[-] [email protected] 86 points 1 day ago

Sounds like what someone might make up who was retroactively making up reasons for commonly used terms.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

folk etymology my beloathed

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

edit: nvm other people pointed it out.

it's just too convoluted and cryptic to be true.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

shipping literal blocks of ice from wherever the fuck just-in-time so people could cool their shit blows my mind a little every time i think about it. we take fridges for granted.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, we live in one of the best times in human history.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

i wouldnt go as far. we do have nuclear weapons, more addictive drugs than ever less friendship than ever and the most effective brainwashing ever invented. we are worse off on so many ways.

[-] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago

I don't know which direction it's coming from, but there is some misinformation in this thread and I don't appreciate it.

[-] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago

Several theories have been put forward for the origin of the term in a film context. One explanation pertains to the practice of "block booking" whereby a studio would sell a package of films to theaters, rather than permitting them to select which films they wanted to exhibit. However, this practice was outlawed in 1948 before the term became common parlance; while pre-1948 high-grossing big-budget spectacles may be retroactively labelled "blockbusters," this is not how they were known at the time. Another explanation is that trade publications would often advertise the popularity of a film by including illustrations showing long queues often extending around the block, but in reality the term was never used in this way. The term was actually first coined by publicists who drew on readers' familiarity with the blockbuster bombs, drawing an analogy with the bomb's huge impact. The trade press subsequently appropriated the term as short-hand for a film's commercial potential

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockbuster_(entertainment)

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Looking up 'blockbuster word origin' on Searx.ng, it seems generally accepted that the term origin started with WWII bombs.

Oxford Reference

Wikipedia

A stack exchange convo that goes into some detail

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

are you talking about the comment section or the post itself? i don't see anyone in the comments who disagrees that this is folk etymology.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Both. The comments have several "Answers".

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

All but a few without sourced.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Wrong, the term was invented in 1962 by James Buster and Frederick Block, who were trying to measure movie success rate trends

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

LMAO i love this

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is not true at all. Atleast not for modern blockbusters since starwars and jaws.

[-] [email protected] -5 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

I think we all meant what he knew.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I already did!

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago

Thats an outdated term which was eventually used by a VHS rental store after the term was outdated. And NOW, the VHS rental store is outdated. Maybe in 30 years there will be a post "TIL people used to rent VHS tapes as their primary source for watching movies at home. It was called Blockbuster!"

this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
68 points (58.0% liked)

Today I Learned

22179 readers
933 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS