281
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago

Fuck Israel, genocidal scum!

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The way they quoted "genocide in Gaza", for some reason, my mind thought that it was a limited ice cream flavor and I was trying to figure out what the pun was. Grahamacide? Jamacide?

One of those rare occasions where something in such terrible taste is fucking delicious.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

Unilever does business in illegally occupied Palestine and their words with the issue is like Lindsey Graham's words with political issues: whichever way the wind blows. Focus on actions, words don't mean anything, and I'm beginning to wonder if they ever did.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

This is Ben snd Jerry's, not Unilever. Unilever does business in the occupied territories against the wishes of the Ben and Jerry's people.

[-] [email protected] -4 points 1 day ago

They should've considered that when they sold out their hippie ideals for corporate profits. Too late now.

[-] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago

They did. They are currently engaged in a lawsuit with Unilever because the corporation is in violation of the agreements both sides agreed to during the merger.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

So we're faulting them for a decision that was sound based on the data at the time, because something changed externally to render it less sound?

Is that what we're doing? Have you ever made any decisions based on 80% certainty and it turned out differently? Please also include the punishment you've self-assigned to address the now-foolish choice, and how you intend to only select absolutely confirmed 100% perfect choices in the future.

After all, that's what you seem to be requiring of the ice cream people.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago

That's not what it is at all. The hippies sold out and were shocked when it didn't go their way.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

They did put in some safeguards that kept things running fairly insulated for a couple decades.

But anyone could have guessed it wouldn't be permanent, I am not sure if they were kidding themselves or what. You can't make a corporation moral.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

I like their company. Just wish their product wasn't all these bizarre unappealing flavours.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
281 points (97.6% liked)

politics

23703 readers
2453 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS