can i has rrrrrreeallly fast train to take me from vancouer to toronto pls thk

Hopefully Doug Ford's highway and highway tunnel don't make the list but high speed rail does.

For all his talk about increasing economic productivity in terms of producing more goods, all I see is more resource extraction.

Carbon capture is a darling of the oil industry that allows them to keep doing business as usual. It requires an insane amount of often unclean electricity and is vapourware that does not work at scale. Oil companies love carbon capture, just like they love "natural gas" that lets them sell biproducts of fracking.

Nuclear is great but our climate does not have the 10 years it takes to build a reactor.

Where we're headed, we'll end up with more oil output, more emissions, more car-dependency, and a bunch of partially completed projects in 10 years.

This needs more focus on low carbon public transit and fast and achievable solar and wind.

It is abundantly clear that even if every automobile was replaced with an EV, we'd still bake our planet. Mining the ring of fire is a profit-seeking, extractive venture and not a climate solution.

I use a lot of fossil fuels and t think they’re going to last longer than some government goals suggest, but I’m not certain that any new pipelines make sense, anywhere in the world. Fix up and maintain the existing ones until they can be mothballed. Maybe there’s an argument to be made that exiting fossil fuels leaves market for other countries, or something, but investing heavily in a technology that we know for certain is hurting humanity’s chances of survival doesn’t seem bright.

I guess it all hinges on which pipelines "make sense"; if none, I approve 🤷

Doomberg was saying Carney was going to run for election in order to push pipelines through Quebec for a while now, using a separation crisis to do so. All his predictions seem to be coming true.