356
submitted 4 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

https://newsie.social/@royaards/114591195982719122

I never get this 'we' who is 'we'?

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 39 points 4 days ago

Stupid screenshot has the Eye icon on the image which hides the burning trees.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 4 days ago

We are not blind. The corporations need to fix this mess they created.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

Yeah, wtf am I supposed to do about it? I don't even own the place I live in.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

We is society as a whole. Some of us care but not enough.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

hardly anyone can afford to live like this

[-] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago

"We" (or "most people") is what people use when they want to make their statement more powerful. Ironically it actually makes it weaker and less relatable than if they picked someone specific or themselves.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

yeah I'm not doing any of that shit, don't drag me into your shitty late stage capitalism life style

[-] [email protected] 13 points 4 days ago

I never get this 'we' who is 'we'?

We as in a collective of people making decisions, we wouldn't blind ourselves if we were a we making some decisions collectively.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

They got their's though /s

[-] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago

Until they get the water bill, sure.

But part of the problem with the cartoon is that it makes climate change an individualist problem rather than an industrial problem. You yell at this couple for daring to have a little slice of normal without asking what their alternatives were. If everything is cookie-cutter homes scattered across Arizona desert, where else do I live? If the HOA says I need to have a lawn or eat fines every month, how do I avoid running my sprinkler? If I'm born into a wasteland and I'm raised to believe wasteland life is normal, why would I behave any differently?

Nevermind that Company Co ~~built~~ imported from overseas via cheap manual labor the house and the walls and the grill and the sprinkler and the big blinders, in order to get this family to spend 40 hrs a week turning out surplus value for their shareholders. Who really benefits from this arrangement?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

Everyone who plays golf and isn’t in the Highlands

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

The fires in the upper left corner gave it away, didn't they? :-P

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Like a Phoenix (AZ), it’ll rise from the Ashes and die of thirst

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

If there’s nothing more I can do about it why would I torture myself with constant news about how the world is ending? It’s been doing that for years and nobody wants to work together to actually solve the problem.

Ignorance may not be bliss but it’s a hell if a lot nicer way to live than constantly knowing there’s a massive existential threat that nobody is taking any meaningful action on.

Because the #1 most effective thing you can do to fight climate change is “eliminate” people in the developed world. Anyone making more than about $40,000 a year is contributing disproportionately to climate change.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

nobody wants to work together to actually solve the problem

Quite a few people want to work together to solve the problem. But they have no access to the capital or the policy that created the problem.

All the turkeys agree that the Turkey Farmer is a big threat. But they're mostly busy just staying fed. They have no free time, no surplus income, and no material capacity for resistance. If the Turkey Farmer sees a turkey getting too far out of line, its killed and eaten. So nobody wants to stick their necks out.

Because the #1 most effective thing you can do to fight climate change is “eliminate” people in the developed world. Anyone making more than about $40,000 a year is contributing disproportionately to climate change.

That's an absurd and self-defeating take. "If you want to fight climate change, fucking go kill yourself" isn't a rallying cry anyone is going to get behind and it certainly isn't going to cut carbon emissions at a global scale. FFS, go through Florida and straight up do a holocaust of every suburban neighborhood on the peninsula. See if that shifts the needle on the emissions by any of the LLM Factories even one iota. See if it cuts the volume of concrete being poured in Dubai or the natural gas pumped out of the Permian Basin. See how much of the Amazon grows back - or hell, how much of the Everglades for that matter - when you're done.

Nevermind that the only people we're doing genocide against are the global poor. It's the Gaza refugees who are getting purged, not the Hotwives of Atlanta, Georgia. Russian and Ukrainian lumpen proles are lining up to shoot one another, not Berlin industrialists or London bankers or Moscow Oligarchs. The folks getting rounded up and executed in Sri Lanka and Kashmir and Myanmar aren't the ones emitting all the waste.

All these "Exterminate the Brutes" insinuations achieve is another round of capitalist-orchestrated eugenics campaigns. If you can't see a path towards the working class living within their ecological means, you'll never mobilize a labor powered environmentalist movement against the folks profiting off ecological destruction.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

You’re exactly right: We are entirely fucked no matter what we do, because even if every American dropped dead tomorrow it would still not be enough to stop climate change.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

We are entirely fucked no matter what we do

Modern industrial countries exist with far lower emissions per person. We're not screwed no matter what. We can - and other countries have - modernized to get under the line.

You don't need to die to get your emissions under post-90s emission rates.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

Far lower emissions per person, but far greater emissions overall because there’s so many more people.

And we’re gonna blow right by 1.5 degrees and maybe hit 2 or 2.5 degrees. That’s pretty fucked.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Far lower emissions per person, but far greater emissions overall

Aspiring to the emissions rate of Qatar because so few people live there is a call for genocide not environmental reform.

And we’re gonna blow right by 1.5 degrees and maybe hit 2 or 2.5 degrees.

Not thanks to India, where 1.4B people have managed to keep their gross emissions rate well under their 350M peers in the United States. But for some reason Americans will tell you the solution is to nuke Delhi to cover the balance.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Nuking Delhi is stupid.

We should nuke LA.

Or make 30% of Americans live on under $4 a day. That would reduce emissions.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago

We should nuke LA.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_2025_Southern_California_wildfires

Mother Nature beat you to it. Surely this means we'll see large emissions reductions in California, right?

[-] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago

The fires didn’t kill enough of the invasive primate species to make a difference.

Then again, like you said, killing any number of these pests won’t make a dent anyway.

this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
356 points (97.6% liked)

solarpunk memes

3929 readers
691 users here now

For when you need a laugh!

The definition of a "meme" here is intentionally pretty loose. Images, screenshots, and the like are welcome!

But, keep it lighthearted and/or within our server's ideals.

Posts and comments that are hateful, trolling, inciting, and/or overly negative will be removed at the moderators' discretion.

Please follow all slrpnk.net rules and community guidelines

Have fun!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS