265
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 106 points 3 days ago

"Criminal white house stunned that criminal is caught being a criminal"

Tell me they believe the law doesn't apply to them without telling me they believe the law doesn't apply to them.

Problem is, they're right. Absolutely fuck-all will come of this. We now return you to your regularly scheduled enshittification of the united states.

[-] [email protected] 23 points 3 days ago

Well, not to defend these idiots, but according to the article, the wiretap turned out to be untrue. They're investigating leaks and Hegseth's lawyer started the rumor but now denies it and basically him and everybody under Hegseth are stupid and are turning the leak investigation into a way to attack each other for personal vendettas and everybody is stupid and lying and infighting and nobody above them knows what is going on, not that there's anyone above them with an IQ close to triple digits anyway.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

Hegseth’s lawyer started the rumor but now denies it

Sounds to me like he accidentally told the truth and now he's trying to walk it back.

I mean, maybe you're right, but with these fucksticks? They don't get the benefit of the doubt anymore.

[-] [email protected] 55 points 3 days ago

Why did you fire your aids, Hegseth?

Because they leaked the batshit insane plan to invade Panama.

How did you figure that out?

I wiretaped them through the NSA.

That's illegal Hegseth!

Ok, I didn't wiretap them. I just didn't like them. They didn't get along with my cheif of staff.

Then just say that! You have the power to fire people you don't like without both confirming a leak and admitting to a federal crime!

Well, to be fair, I was also drunk....

[-] [email protected] 35 points 3 days ago

Hegseth's personal lawyer, Tim Parlatore. . . [was] Commissioned by Hegseth as a commander in the navy reserve

Honestly, in any other timeline, that alone would be headline worthy. Why the fuck is your personal lawyer a commisioned officer? Do you think attorney client privilege will still apply if he gets court martialed? Or is it because he's covered up crimes for you before?

[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

The US military was preparing options for how to reclaim the Panama Canal?

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

They very much go the batman route with planning.

[-] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

What a delightful layer cake of lies, rumours and severe incompetence that is the Republican Trump administration.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

As a reality television show for watchers unaffected by any outcomes, it's a masterpiece. For the psychoneurotic main actors it must be exhilarating. For all the extras it's a special kind of hell where most of the tunnels just lead to more darkness and uncertainty.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

We need some extras to make their own breaks into becoming leading characters.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

And still we all stand by and take no action…

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

But the advisers found the claim to be untrue and complained that they were being fed dubious information by Hegseth’s personal lawyer, Tim Parlatore, who had been tasked with overseeing the investigation.

When misinformation comes naturally even your friends have no clue what's real.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

These people don't have friends.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

They also then learned of a rumor at the Pentagon that the air force office of special investigations (OSI), which had been working the case for weeks beforehand, had possibly identified the leaked Panama canal document by virtue of the fact that it was a draft that lacked certain details that were in the final version of the document.

As the rumor went, the document had led the air force OSI to focus its investigation on mid-level aides who worked in the US Southern or Central Command or for the joint chiefs of staff, and had not been told to focus on the activities of the three aides until the weekend after they had been fired.

It was not immediately clear whether the the rumor was correct or even from where it emerged. But it appears to have spurred the White House to press Parlatore to disclose the evidence against Caldwell, including how the Pentagon knew what was on his phone.

At first, Parlatore rebuffed the attempts to obtain the underlying evidence, noting it was inappropriate for the executive branch to insert itself into an ongoing criminal investigation that he said could still yield charges.

But towards the end of April, according to what the Trump advisers shared inside the White House, Parlatore suggested that there had been a warrantless wiretap on Caldwell’s phone.

Madness.

this post was submitted on 27 May 2025
265 points (99.3% liked)

politics

23672 readers
2979 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS