Purely theatrical.
I'd normally agree, but disagree now only because many are out in the media saying they won't support it until certain measures are removed or addressed. The GOP is already failing, so I don't see why they'd be throwing out theatrics. Surely some are just making threats to get pork for their districts, but we'll see who caves on which bits first. It's going nowhere as of now, so whomever threatens to not vote for it will be getting something - hopefully for their constituents.
I guess they're not exactly happy to have their inboxes (physical and digital) flooded again.
Or the fact that Trump may be fucking with their buddies, remember a lot of senators are friendly with state level businesses that are probably gettin fucked by Trump's bullshit.
Spoiler: they won’t
Republican representatives lie again.
This is "stopped clock" shit. These people do not want the same thing as you. If they change anything about this bill, it will end up cutting more to offset the billionaire tax cuts that are non-negotiable to every single elected Republican.
They're going to stand up to him like Greg Abbott.
Greg Abbott is a punk bitch though.
Also can't stand for anything.
The final contents of the bill will need to be blessed by both chambers, with Democrats almost certain to vote unanimously in opposition.
I wish.
With the provision striping the courts ability to use federal funds to hold the executive branch in contempt it all but guarantees every Democrat will have to vote against it. The entire bill is likely considered unconditional because of it
If any Democrats vote for it I'd be surprised. Like yeah Schumer sucks but I think even they can see they'd be run out of town if any vote for this.
I wish they had the balls.
Oh, please... Mitch put up a more legit fight.
Freezes
Well guess what. Debt won’t be reduced and no one will stop the bill. Cause fuck you.
i cannot support this bill, it doesnt hurt my constituency enough
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News