77
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh really? Every way? What about boardroom bigotry, huh? Bet their prejudice KPIs took a hit this quarter. I'll wager their were fewer executive sexual harassment accusations, too.

[-] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

[Sarcasm] You mean DEI makes things less prejudice and work better? We are shocked!

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Rome did too (mostly)

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

I think it’s more a correlation than a causation. It is not that LGBTQ are better at running companies, but that a company that never promotes or advances them is almost certainly not promoting based on capability and appropriateness for a position.

More likely it’s promoting based on personal relationships and connections, an old boys network. Which leads to people who are less qualified, but better connected, ending up up running things.

Counter to what the anti-DEI people will claim, diversity in a company is the result of hiring the best qualified people, a company that lacks diversity is a sign of poor hiring practices.

this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
77 points (98.7% liked)

LGBTQ+

3417 readers
804 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS