this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
675 points (94.7% liked)

Political Memes

8111 readers
3296 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 minutes ago

I wish there was a test.

Not a bullshit CosmoBuzzfeed quiz, but an actual "if you answered A on these three questions, you tend towards MarxoCapitalist. Here's a community full of people who mostly agree with you about political stuff."

We'd still have Home and Local and All, but it'd be nice to know who my people are instead of needing a college degree to navigate the bullshit everyone says about everyone else.

I don't think anyone knows what socialism is.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Idk. The kind where I believe that every adult over 18 should be given 80m2 by the government. Apartment, office space, storage space, workshop, lab, whatever.

I believe that you shouldn't need to worry about a place to live at the bare minimum, and I believe that not having space for people to use and experiment with is one of the main hindrances of economic development (development, not "growth")

[–] [email protected] 1 points 29 minutes ago

They can keep all the other stuff if they are giving me 6,400 million dollars

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Anarcho-transhumanist. I believe that you just can't trust humans to govern each other, so the best solution is give them all the tools to survive independently.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 hours ago

As far as I can tell I'm an anarchist collectivist. But I don't really read much theory (because of a memory retention disorder) or try very hard to categorize myself.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 hours ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 hour ago

ah yes, because leftists are such unreasonable people always fighting each other

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

flexible on range of solutions for dealing with the billionaire problem

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

“Ally? That’s a funny way to spell FASCIST!”

-the American left during the 24’ election

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I want a society that is a democratic communist society ruled by a democratically elected council. None of this single person has ultimate authority, because that's the worst weak point. All laws apply to the leaders as well as the masses. Money should either be abolished, or capped. No individual should be able to acquire enough influence that they can dictate anything about others lives. Democratize and co-op all workplaces. All basic rights of humans are absolutely not allowed to be profited off of.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

In our current system, no individual should be able to acquire enough influence that they can dictate anything about others lives.

Humans are fallible. Any council can be corrupted or dominated slowly, especially as long as currency and power corrupts and hierarchies can exist. Democratic socialism is a utopian idea of a fallible system, when what you are really asking for is the abolishment of corruption, prejudice and greed itself, the cancers that ruin otherwise harmonious societies.

Until a form of government arises that rewards the participant for seeking purpose rather than fame or reward, we'll just be replacing fractured systems, destined to fail, over and over and over again.

but, per my own personal bias, I don't believe people are inherently good enough to act that way. I believe we will destroy ourselves before we ever get there. The individuals that would dominate the next system of government will be the ones holding the pen to craft it, so it goes...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The Baha'is have a system that kinda works like that. They don't have clergy, the have democratically elected spiritual assemblys. The rule is that no one that wants the position can have it. The communities elect people that have proven they can lead with humility.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

I think we would do well with elections based sortition.

For any given elected position, you select 12 candidates at random from among the whole population. You give them a chance to decline the run if they want. If they decline to run, then you draw more names until you get 12 candidates. You then run an election with those 12 people on the ballot.

You essentially replace the primary process with a random lottery. With a pool of 12 candidates, it would be very rare to not have some representation among both the left and right for any given election. And people would still get to choose the final winner. But the real sociopaths, the people who want power above all else, who will sell their souls for it? They're simply extremely unlikely to win the lottery to become a candidate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Your ideal society in the best case scenario is... 500 or so years away!

[–] [email protected] 44 points 13 hours ago (11 children)

I just want people to have food, shelter and healthcare at an affordable price.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 hours ago

Some call this “Leftist extremism”. =/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 hours ago

Ugh George Soros poisoned Progressivism!

By "affordable" I'm assuming you mean free. Always wanting a handout, of course.

I just want untaxed inheritance, corporate welfare on top of more tax breaks for me and all my friends, unregulated surveillance and data collection of the plebs so I can continue to make even more money (untaxed obvs), exclusive and elite private universities, and a justice system where I can live free of consequence and purchase a judge at a reasonable price because I believe in being fiscally conservative.

Food, shelter, and healthcare are things I've just never had to think about really. Although, I would also prefer that if too many people are worrying about those things in my immediate vicinity, they be shuffled around or forcibly moved to a different vicinity.

That way I don't have to start thinking too much. It's really unfair when that happens, because it starts to make me feel all kinds of uncomfortable. Uncomfortable is not something I'm used to feeling, and since I don't like to think about things, I never stop and think about why somebody else being uncomfortable would also make me feel so uncomfortable.

Logically, the solution is to just put those people somewhere not visible to me, and then complain about what society is "turning into these days" when they slip through the privilege perimeter.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

Personally? For me, I don't care what kind of leftist you are.

For now, we are united against one singular goal, the total annihilation of Donald Trump's fascist regime of religious cultists and billionaire oligarchs.

Before we throw a single punch at one another, we have to solve this first. We'd all rather eachother's ideals than him if given the choice.

load more comments
view more: next ›