top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 200 points 3 years ago (6 children)

Google Chrome and "Enhanced Ad Privacy".

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 51 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (4 children)

    That won't destroy their community.

    edit: Because people who use chrome, doesn't care about privacy, freedom or anything like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 178 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child)

    Zoom: "wE cAnT cOlAbOrAtE iF wErE nOt In PeRsOn. We NeEd EmPloYeEs To ReTuRn tO tHe OfFiCe."

    They have stiff competition but this has to be one of the most incompetent boners I have ever seen pulled by a major corporation. Stating very clearly to the entire world that you have no confidence in your own product. If Eric Yuan (Zoom's CEO) wasn't the principle shareholder he probably would have been fired out of a cannon by now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 128 points 3 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 125 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    Decentralize. Democratize. Demonetize. Time for a new internet, a new gaming industry, and a way of sharing thoughts and ideas where clout is the least important factor.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 86 points 3 years ago (12 children)

    Literally every company is doing this. There was a time when, for example, Apple could reverse engineer the Word document format and make their own word processor that uses them. This was very common and resulted in things like IBM PC clones that sped up innovation.

    Now companies use litigation and corporate buyouts to reduce their competition, then set up ways to extract rents on customers rather than providing a service. Business folks love this because it means a consistent stream of revenue that won't go away. And now you've got carmakers looking to charge by the month for features.

    For more details, read Chokepoint Capitalism.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    And now you've got carmakers looking to charge by the month for features.

    When I reach the point at which I am forced to buy a car like that, I'd just find out from where the feature gets controlled and hack in my own controller and a good 'ol switch.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Right now it's your right to do what you want to your car as long as it still passes vehicle inspection, but it appears that car makers want new laws that prevent you from modifying your own car.

    If we just sit on our hands now, well likely move into a future where we will be forced to either pay subscription or take public transit, which requires subscriptions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 72 points 3 years ago (22 children)

    Microsoft. They've been itching to go to a fully cloud-dependent subscription-only model for Windows for a while now.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] [S] 75 points 3 years ago (20 children)

    I could've sworn that they said win 10 was going to be the last windows and it would just receive updates.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 20 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 72 points 3 years ago (5 children)

    This is a turning point and I'm here for it

    Twitter, Reddit, Facebook => Fediverse

    Unity => Godot

    AAA Studios => Indie devs

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 63 points 3 years ago (16 children)

    Enshittification

    What'd Blizzard do?

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] [S] 36 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    Well this year was overwatch 2, which was pretty much the same game but wrapped in skeezy monetization, with the excuse that they needed to drop a sequel (and delete the original) for their new PVE content. Then a few months later, they announced they weren't even going to do the PVE content, but they were keeping the new monetization.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Seriously fuck them to death for this. And their “new maps” is just like the same fucking maps but at nighttime or daytime instead! OoO what a sequel! The company deserves to crash and burn.

    Also I PAID for one of the call of duty games and after a year they one day just said I can’t play it anymore because they ended support for older versions of windows, of course they also refused to refund me. I didn’t buy “one year” of gameplay I bought the fucking game. Never making that mistake again.

    Just relentlessly fucking greedy and shitty. It’s a shame people enable this bullshit by spending $30 on character skins and paying out the ass for lootboxes. We need to answer them with the loss of our business. I did my part and uninstalled all their IP and refuse to give them another dollar of my money ever again until/unless I see a 180 in their policies and practices.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 58 points 3 years ago (15 children)

    Twitter Reddit Unity Blizzard Microsoft Epic Google All of the Movie industry. All of the animation industry. All of the Gaming publishers.

    Basically, everything, everywhere.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 53 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    "Why don't you pay for every damn bullet you fire in the game you fucking peasants!!??" -Unity CEO

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] 48 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 44 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    Unfortunately and admittedly, we are the problem. These companies know that people pay for convenience and stick to what they know. If we were less likely to do so companies would have to raise their standards. Take Twitter for example, even with Musks over inflated numbers other sources indicate there's still hundreds of millions of Twitter users. They see all of the things Musk has done and it hasn't buried his business thus they are now taking pages out of his book.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (5 children)

    Blaming individuals for not performing collective consumerist acts against corporations is liberal bullshit that only excuses corporate wrongdoing.

    EDIT: To spare other people from having to read the smug corpo clown buffoonery beneath this post, I'll put the most relevant part I wanted to stress up here instead:

    The eight hour day, the end of widescale child labor, the concept of minimum wage, and much more that improved the lot of the working class and of society as a whole were not the products of "vote with your wallet" nonsense. Slavery wasn't abolished in the United States (it still isnt if you count the prison system, and you should, but stay with me here) by cotton buyers coming together to only buy "ethical" cotton.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 41 points 3 years ago (9 children)

    I hear Discord is due for its enshitification.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 39 points 3 years ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 37 points 3 years ago

    Red Hat (Enrerprise Linux) & HashiCorp (Terraform) closed the source of their products in different ways, also fucking over their community of clients and contributors, though their reasoning seems slightly more sane than "no more free money, aaargh!"

  • source
  • [–] 37 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Companies can no longer continue to grow through innovating their products or services. Companies are no longer competing in that domain because they have already conquered it completely.

    Companies can no longer grow through marketing and branding. Branding is everything and everywhere now, even normal people have personal brands, they have already conquered that domain and most people have grown to disdain marketing and branding so its less effective than ever.

    Companies can no longer grow through data collection and advertising. All data is collected, ads are everywhere and they are always listening to everything we say and do. They have already conquered that domain.

    Now all that's left is competition through exploitation. It's the only way companies can continue to grow. That is the stage of capitalism we are entering.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 33 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Okay wait what the fuck is this picture

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 32 points 3 years ago

    Forgot WotC. They sent Pinkertons after a leaker and tried to drain every last dollar out of third party creators with their OGL update.

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 3 years ago (20 children)
  • [–] 82 points 3 years ago (10 children)

    Twitter, Reddit, and Unity have not been profitable. This was fine when money was cheap (near zero interest rates). The market was awash with capital trying to find something that could turn a profit. A business plan that was basically underpants gnomes (1. Gather underpants 2. ???? 3. Profit!) was acceptable. Twitter’s and Reddit’s 1. was “gather users”, Unity’s “gather projects”. Now money isn’t free anymore, and capital is demanding that these businesses fill in 2. with something. Twitter is doing whatever Musk thinks is good, Reddit is trying to monetize its API to make AIs pay and to serve real users ads through its first party app, and Unity is trying to monetize the projects it has gathered. All of them have been offering a product below cost, and users are understandably angry that the cost is going up. (And in many cases, finding that the product isn’t really worth anything.)

    Blizzard is different. It operates in a creative field and has been very profitable. Games are art as much as they are products that are sold. As such, they’re fickle: you can’t assembly line manufacture games and make a hit after hit. Artists in music that turn out bangers decade after decade are rare, as are authors, directors, etc. Blizzard’s streak of awesome games was bound to end eventually. AAA games are also extremely expensive to make: if you make an AAA game, it must be a hit or you’ll lose money. Alternatively, you can use dark patterns to monetize it, then it doesn’t have to be as good to make loads of money. Banking on your creatives to keep beating the odds is risky; infesting a good enough game with scummy monetization is a safer bet.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
  • [–] 54 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    It varies from company to company, but when infinite growth becomes unrealistic they get desperate for new revenue and start doing shitty nickel and dime tactics.

    More specifically for Reddit thoughts are they realized that these new AI tools had already pilfered all of “their” content and they did not see a cent from it and responded wildly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 years ago

    Not only Infinite growths, but infinite money. Since at least 2008, money was almost free for tech companies and somehow nobody cared, that they never made any profit - Twitter had like 2 profitable quarters in its entire history.

    Now that interest rates went up, investors want to see results and if you can't burn through venture capital anymore, you have to get money somewhere else.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 29 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    Please somehow let YouTube/Google be next. Somehow.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 26 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Netflix... except that move is sadly paying off

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 24 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    The year is 2023, every single major companies are racing each other to become Public Enemy No.1 and shoot themselves in the foot in as many ways as they can think of.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 3 years ago

    companies want to go back to feudalism

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago

    Literally every top 500 company

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 3 years ago (8 children)

    I heard Plex has something going on so people are switching to Jellyfin

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 20 points 3 years ago

    Companies be like:

    trade offer

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    This is such a fucking post. Activision-Blizzard is drowning in cash because people continue to buy their garbage. Diablo Immortal was a great move. OP is completely clueluess.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›