this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
289 points (97.7% liked)

News

29028 readers
4318 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Live Stream Sources

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBejfVOUmBs

TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTjr7VvL9/

Titled "An Urgent Conversation with the American People," the livestreamed discussion comes ahead of Congress' return to session on Monday.

A statement released by both officials' offices said in part, "Republican leaders have made clear their intention to use the coming weeks to advance a reckless budget scheme to President Trump's desk that seeks to gut Medicaid, food assistance and basic needs programs that help people, all to give tax breaks to billionaires. Given what's at stake, these could be some of the most consequential weeks for seniors, kids and families in generations."

According to the statement, Rep. Jeffries and Sen. Booker plan to speak to shared American values and the nation's religious and moral underpinnings, and how the budget bill opposes these beliefs. They also plan to affirm to Americans watching the livestream that their voices matter, especially in this moment in time.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This will accomplish exactly nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Thanks for the detailed info. I'll take it into consideration.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 hours ago

Im impressed. This is an establishment democrat almost doing something that almost qualifies as useful. He's almost so close!

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 hours ago

Fuck off, Jeffries. You yourself said you’re unwilling to accept or support primary challengers to the oligarch demographic in the party caucus. You can go fuck yourself. As far as I’m concerned, you’re a part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Why the fuck aren't they sitting in the chamber of the Senate where they would be actually disrupting the business that's happening. Sitting on steps ain't stopping jack.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The chamber was closed for recess for two weeks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

There's so much randomized "it's not enough" sentiment on lemmy. We all need to focus the hell up, because responding to every single little thing with "how dare they not do more" is so counterproductive. Nobody will ever do anything.

I'm not even saying this action is progress - but shitting on it isn't progress either.

That user just suggested that the congressmen should break into an empty room, as if that would so something.

And even if congress was in session... these people are the people that are supposed to sit in congress. They literally belong there. What, exactly, would that accomplish?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I completely agree. There are a lot of comments that just seem to find a way to keep people down on Democrats, even when they do the right thing. Many of them were the ones shouting Genocide Joe last year. Plenty of them are accelationist leftists or possibly even right-wing propagandists just trying to keep people from a blue wave next November.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

I think expecting Democratic Senators to vote no on things like the Laken Riley Act or Democratic Judges to not sign bogus warrants to arrest Gaza protesters should be a bare minimum expectation.

Them not even being able to do that " keeps people down on the Democrats."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 minutes ago

I agree they’re not all good. It’s when people paint them all with one brush and refuse to acknowledge good action when I call bullshit. Be loyal to your ideals, not your party.

What Booker and Jeffries are doing by giving the microphone to people on social programs on the steps of the Capitol will reach many more citizens than shouting into an echo chamber. I applaud that. I’m not defending every vote they’ve ever cast, I’m simply recognizing a good action.

The pessimism on here is so diseased that people don’t even seem to have their own ideals other than ‘Democrats bad.’

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 hours ago

Cory Booker needs to go away. He only cares when it affords him headlines so that he can feel good about himself running for president yet again. He will never be president, ever.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 23 hours ago

That's not a sit in, that's a photo op.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

This is not a sit-in, and degrades what sit-ins actually were.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sit-in
Democratic leadership is complacent.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I'm increasingly convinced Democratic leadership is in on it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 12 hours ago

They are. They will not bite the hand that feeds and those billionaires are the ones feeding them. Citizens United and Super PACs are pure corruption.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly what do they, as individual career politicians in a now-nakedly-corrupt industry, stand to gain from fixing any of it? Their actions are primariy about advancing their careers because Congress has been broken for years and what else would they do?

The consultant's credo is, "if you can't be part of the solution, there's good money to be made in prolonging the problem."

Meaning the politician's credo is now the reverse "There's good money to be made in prolonging the problem, you won't be part of the solution."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago

Absolutely, in a rapidly developing corrupt oligarchy, you're going to see the people in power rapidly distill into two groups, the ideologically committed and the aspiring oligarchs, and I think you're going to find the latter group is significantly larger than the former.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago

Feels similar to a filibuster that was actually just an extended speech.

It looks like the appearance of action, without consequence.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

Yeah. You want to make it a protest, do it on the floor of the Senate and block it until they remove you.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

“Extended lunch” didn’t attract any cameras so they had to workshop the name.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Republican leaders have made clear their intention to use the coming weeks to advance a reckless budget scheme to President Trump's desk that seeks to gut Medicaid, food assistance and basic needs programs that help people, all to give tax breaks to billionaires. Given what's at stake, these could be some of the most consequential weeks for seniors, kids and families in generations.

Problem is... They've said this same exact thing for many years now. People stop listening and this just becomes background noise.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

He had plenty of engagement with his 25 hour speech. Let’s hope this generates similar awareness.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 day ago

Wait, I thought Booker was headed to El Salvador to bring back Garcia.

I would like to have a full update on all past stunts before we begin the next stunt.

load more comments
view more: next ›