top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 158 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Why connect to the Internet with it then. The browser could just make everything up on the fly.

Got questions about a medication?

Maybe you want to check up on some disease symptoms?

AI can make something that sounds vaguely plausible.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 82 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Why connect to the Internet with it then

    To check if your subscription to their models is still valid of course

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 116 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Sounds like the best thing that could happen to Firefox

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 1 year ago* (6 children)

    Unfortunately, Mozilla is investing a ton of money into AI, too.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    A desperate attempt of revenue diversification.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Considering how little they invest into their core product compared to all the other shit and how much money the top brass earns despite declining market share, I don't think they're hurting for money that much.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    They are investing a lot in their core product. Problem is that you can't really monatize it. You want Firefox to be paywalled?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Some of their I initiatives are good, like the built-in local translation tool we now have.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago

    Also their initiative to recognise images and generate alt-text for screen-reader users.

    My sister is blind and screen readers are close to useless on the web, so it was great to hear Mozilla is working on that.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 47 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Mozilla spinning off control of its development to an independent group the way they did with Thunderbird would be the best thing that could happen to Firefox.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Thunderbird :

    Operated by MZLA Technologies Corporation, a subsidiary of the Mozilla Foundation, Thunderbird is an independent, community-driven project that is managed and overseen by the Thunderbird Council, which is elected by the Thunderbird community.

    Chrome self-destructing because of stupidity like AI would only ever manage to be a close second, at best.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 64 points 1 year ago

    OpenAI is like a zombie stumbling around trying to infect everything. We shove it away because it’s fuckin’ gross and we want nothing to do with it, while the bosses that reanimated it are like “well fuck, we made this thing, we have to use it for something.”

  • source
  • [–] 53 points 1 year ago*

    You know how we thought " How could chrome get any worse?", well we have an answer.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Are these fucks stupid? Chromium is open sourced. They can do it themselves

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    They don't want to buy the browser. They want to buy the brand and the users. Chrome makes up over half the browser market. Think of all the data they could extract from Chrome users. It would cost significantly more to fork chromium and grow the user base to a point where they could extract anything valuable from them, and that's assuming they'd be successful enough to make it happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 33 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Great! Now not only can chrome eat all my system memory, it can use all my GPU memory at the same time! It's genius!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Likely it'll use the cloud for processing, you'll just get really hard-to-opt-out AI features, like "prompt by default" and "AI autocomplete", which you can only "snooze" as they'll automatically be turned back on the moment there's a "great new feature", like putting a filter on by default on image generators to fool the eye that it's made by real artists.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    How the fuck would this be more cost effective than them making their own chrome based browser and not be a demonstration of their over inflated operating costs and company valuation?

    If you are paying for a service that is charging you enough to allow them to buy the most widly used browser from a company whose business model is to monopolize data, then maybe you're paying them a titbit more than what the service they're providing is worth.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm sure they're less interested about buying Chrome than they are about buying Chrome's market share

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    What allows them to buy chrome is ridiculous investment money, not what they're charging. From what I read, I think they're still running a loss because required processing power is still just so insanely ridiculous for AI.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago

    How to kill Chrome faster, make it AI only. LOL!!!

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    don't they already have brave for that?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    Validating my years old decision to use Firefox

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    When a company considers buying Chrome because it could help them extend the reach of their product, they are fucking drunk and need to go home. This would be like buying the state of Nevada so you could put up billboards all over Las Vegas.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Chrome or Chromium project?

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    Isn't Google going to do it themselves?

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    WTF? Just download it for free.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    This can't happen. Not because I think google is doing a wonderful job, but it's got serious market share now. Basically a monopoly. It needs to leave the hands of for profit companies and be transitioned to a foundation.

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I’ve said this before and will say it again. The only tech companies that should be allowed to buy Chrome are Canonical and its equivalents.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›