you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How the fuck would this be more cost effective than them making their own chrome based browser and not be a demonstration of their over inflated operating costs and company valuation?

If you are paying for a service that is charging you enough to allow them to buy the most widly used browser from a company whose business model is to monopolize data, then maybe you're paying them a titbit more than what the service they're providing is worth.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 64 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm sure they're less interested about buying Chrome than they are about buying Chrome's market share

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    What allows them to buy chrome is ridiculous investment money, not what they're charging. From what I read, I think they're still running a loss because required processing power is still just so insanely ridiculous for AI.

  • source
  • parent