this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
270 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

69247 readers
4414 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 days ago (2 children)

4 million dollars

So, a slap on the wrist.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Cost of doing business.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It’s not like HP is rolling in coin, but even for them $4m is probably less than they made from the actual infraction. Make it all make sense.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

These fines should really be based on the infraction profits times 100. To make sure you ripped out all benefits of doing these scams. Company goes bankrupt? Too bad. Why would we want to keep illegally operating businesses around anyway.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fines are for the poor. Always have been. Rich people pay “fines” like you wipe your ass.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

And then suddenly they start complaining when a Luigi turns up

[–] [email protected] 77 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lol. 4 mil is absolutely nothing

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Dr. Evil would tend to disagree.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

MUAHAHAHAHA!

[–] [email protected] 61 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Why the fuck false advertising is in quotes?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

When you see quotes in headlines, it's because someone said those exact words. Journalist don't use the sarcastic "quotes".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They don’t want to get sued, probably.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

"False news"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

"If you put everything in quotes is like other people said it and you can't get in trouble."

[–] [email protected] 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

HP sucks, their products suck, and I hope they crash and burn

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I had an HP laptop that melted, but they voided the warranty when I unplugged it to stop it melting.

I avoided their products since then. Fucking $1200 gone.

I also have an HP printer and if I were to ever use HP toner it’s over $1000 for the 4 toners. But the generics are way under $100.

I avoid HP!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I once had a HP laptop, then the hinge got rougher, it became harder to open it up, then the screen popped off and the hinge broke

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I had 2 HP laptops with hinge issues, they broke the motherboard

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago

As if I needed more reasons to dislike HP as a company

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The lawsuit applies to customers who bought HP desktops, laptops, mice or keyboards advertised as being discounted for more than 75% of the time between June 5, 2021 and October 28, 2024.

One of the examples given was a $999.99 HP All-in-One machine bought by a plaintiff in September 2021. It was advertised as having $100 off, marked at $899.99, however it had been sold at that lower price since April 2021.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Oh so many companies would be guilty of something like this

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Good! Fuck HP and their anti-consumer practices!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Yeah ok I guess, but the fact that they settled means they likely would have had to pay much more had this gone to court.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Hasn’t Kohl’s done this for years?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yes, and JC Penny crashed and burned after switching their marketing strategy away from fake "regular prices."

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, I read that. New leadership felt that the eternal sales stuff was bad and changed to "everyday low prices" sort of thing thinking the customers would appreciate the transparency. Nope, the fake "on sale" works.

It's all over the place in sales across every industry. I think it is dumb but I am surprised someone actually got a lawsuit against it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (2 children)

My naive reading is the difference here is HP slapped a discount sticker on it without changing the price.

Where Kohls, et. al. set the price extremely high and then always have it "on sale."

Now, how companies get away with doing the same thing for Black Friday, no idea

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Kohls doesn't have it always on sale. They carefully rotate stock each week to half their stuff is up front and on sale, while the other half is in the back at normal prices. The staff will direct you awat from the normal priced stuff - they don't want anyone to pay the normal price, they just need to have it as normal price once in a while so they can claim to have a sale. (they fear if you buy the normal price you will be mad enough to not come back and repeat sales are worth more than one full price transaction)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

the difference is HP is the actual manufacturer who sets MSRP. I don't think Kohls manufactures anything, they are just a retailer.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

the difference is HP is the actual manufacturer who sets MSRP. I don’t think Kohls manufactures anything, they are just a retailer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

clunker dunker blunker