this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2023
742 points (96.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35562 readers
1526 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 420 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"Oh hey, our tracking is so invasive that it is illegal in your part of the world and we are too lazy to do something about it."

[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dodged a bullet there. Thanks EU

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't want to link to them because fuck them, though the current top comment contains a link to that site.

The interesting thing is that you get this error message on /us while when you remove it, you get redirected to /global and there is no such message. They went out of their way to collect the data of US citizens while still complying with the GDPR for other users.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Byjus is probably the second sussest company in India, so that checks out. They (sort of) sued banks that had lent them money for asking for it back.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you sort of sue someone?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

We are too ~~lazy~~ greedy fucks to do something about it

[–] [email protected] 258 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That website wants to collect and sell all the userdata without consent

[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Consent? That's just some woke word made up to damage family-owned businesses!

Them, probably.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or they can't or won't spend the time to comply to regulations of a region they might not do business in anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 224 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Why is it basically only the EU that seems to have an interest in preventing shitty business practices.

[–] [email protected] 176 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Because the US is controlled by corporations

Asia for the most part doesn't care

Australia is run by right wing nut jobs

New Zealand is quiet so they probably do do something like this but we haven't heard about it.

Japan is Japan. Civil rights isn't really a thing.

And China and Russia love invasion of privacy it's basically the entire basis of their countries.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Well actshually... Australia used to be run by right-wing nutjobs. The current mob in power are centrist nut jobs.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The power behind the throne in Australia is still right wing nut jobs and corporations

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Moatly about capitalism i think. If you put on privacy restrictions, you are regulating the market, while capitalism believes that the market should regulate itself, and customers will simply stop using those websites/softwares overtime if its too bad. I find this completely delusional in the era of mega corporations, but thats the capitalistic aproach to this.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Because they listen to people rather than ignore them and then make policy based on how much money they can make from the deal.

This shows me the EU is actually more democratic then the US is.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's much harder to pay off the lawmakers to keep the status quo when the economic area is controlled by dozens of individual governments.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is actually a particularly important point. The nature of the EU is laden with bureaucracy. Combined with the wide range of cultures, and the rotation of staff, it makes bribing enough people to get your way difficult. You end up needing people in multiple countries to deal with it, and the rotations make long term deals difficult.

The end result is that bribing EU bureaucracy is like trying to stop a river with just hands. It's far less effective, letting the EU be a lot more effective (if slow).

There's a reason so many big business interests want to break up the EU.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 189 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want more predatory websites to do this so that I can avoid them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 103 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some idiots keep using one of my email adresses for god knows what, ending up in me receiving newsletters and shit. Since actual user accounts are associated, I typically recover the password (since its my email adress) and then delete the account.

There are a few websites with similar restrictions though. They are completely fine sending shit to email adresses they never bothered to verify, but reject logins from countries (or even US states!) that they don't want. Morons.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 year ago (2 children)

that's when you report as spam. that shit hurts their trust rating and makes their emails more likely to end up in people's spam folders, pretty much killing their newsletter

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Or auto forward it to their customer service email, or company email.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

You only tell them your email is active with that.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 year ago (17 children)

This is fine imo. If you don’t want to comply, don’t. You just don’t get to extract EU data

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (19 children)

Well, that's one way to comply

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Sadly, I live in the U.S., so if I went to this website, it would definitely take my data and sell it.

We don't get a GDPR to protect us. Be glad you do.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Proxy using an EU based server. Not like websites are going to actually check that you live there.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Perfect. Would be nice if US implemented the same regulations

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago

EU for the win.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

wtf is a byju... looks it up.. ok, interesting.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Well, this is what you wanted isn't it? Your government is protecting you, anyone who can't comply can't serve you.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I read that as you being facetious, but: Yes this is exactly what I want. If a service can not comply with GDPR, the service should not be accessible. It would be great for their customers if the service decided to change their practices to become compliant, but that is a business decision they need to make.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Adding to that: Compliance is not even that hard to implement. I build almost all of my websites with GDPR compliance in mind and it's not really a big deal. There are easy to use tools like Cookie Consent and some of the sites don't even need a banner at all if they have no tracking (which you know, is completely possible too).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

Not "can't comply" but "doesn't want to comply". Other than that fully agreed, it is what I wanted.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

I wish more invasive websites would do this.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trust me, you don't want to visit that website (company).Its sales and marketing methods are scam at best.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Shows how broken the internet was and still is, basically the homeland of the internet is incapable of building pages that comply with basic regulation.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Incapable is not the same as refuses to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I need to know what this website is, so that I never use it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›