this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
33 points (86.7% liked)

politics

22232 readers
3655 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 44 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (4 children)

Answer is simple.

Bring back the CCC. Civilian Conservation Corps trained young men in good trades and paid a good wage.

The infrastructure needs rebuilding and young men need to feel like they have value in society.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_Conservation_Corps

[–] [email protected] 11 points 19 hours ago

You'd revive that program over the bloody corpses of many conservatives. Which, actually, yeah let's do that. A lot of other problems go away if the right wing bleeds out.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'd be down with this being mandatory even (general public service). A lot of people, myself included, have gone through life with very little actual "service" to the community and the nation. We've gotten too used to the idea that inserting yourself into the machine of capitalism is serving your nation.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

If you want a good thought experiment, read "Starship Troopers" by Robert Heinlein.

His fictional future was based on the idea that after WW3 disgruntled veterans came home to a society that was falling apart. The vets decided that they'd take over, and hundreds of years later only veterans are allowed to vote.

The length of service is four years [iirc] and is geared to each person's ability. Most people never do anything but dig holes and fill them up, just to get a taste of earning the franchise. If a blindman in a wheelchair comes in, they will find him some make-work that will push his limits.

Not my personal ideal, but it is an interesting idea.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

And the premise of the movie being that they were running out of wars to fight so they setup a false flag attack that set off the bug wars to keep the military in control. I love the idea of a government work corp but not the idea of it being mandatory. Especially for representation/voting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 hours ago

The movie and the book are two completely different things. Apparently the director didn't even read the entire book and just took a few scenes.

Hunter Thompson wrote one essay where he praised the draft because it forced all kinds of people to meet each other and work together. In the novel "Zombie Jamboree" a draftee says that the draft is a good idea because draftees aren't as likely to commit war crimes as lifers.

I don't know if government service should be mandatory, but I think that the country would be a lot better if more of these trust fund babies knew what it was like to put in a 40 hour week.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Ehhh, I really don't think our problem lies in too many people voting. I'll take the sarcastic and over the top movie version please.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If you'd read the book you'd know that in some parts of the Federation 90% of the adult population had earned the franchise. The solution isn't limiting the number of voters, it's making sure all the voters understand co-operation and team work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't read the book. It just seems like wishful thinking that such limits on voting won't be turned around to oppress the population in general and minorities in particular.

I'm glad it worked out in the book, but can you think of any other government systems that worked out on paper, but failed their live run? I don't want to be part of that mistake, I'm busy enough being part of this American one right now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

The author had some practical, hands on experience with running a political campaign in the real world.

He threw a lot of ideas into his books. "The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress" is a favorite of Libertarians, and it has one character who thinks that Luna should declare itself a monarchy.

"Double Star" has a quick reference to a system I really like. Instead of voting based on where you live, you get to choose your own constituency. Your representative would be a "gamer" or a "farmer" or a "mass transit user." You could change your constituency the same way you're allowed to move to another state.

Heinlein wrote the ultimate military novel [Starship Troopers] the ultimate Libertarian novel [The Moon/Mistress] and the ultimate hippie novel [Stanger In A Strange Land.] He also invented the waterbed and mechanical arms.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 23 hours ago

Idk man, that sounds an awful lot like ~~socialism~~ waste, fraud, and abuse.

Just in case: /s

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

That and a 3 trillion dollar stimulus package.

In fact I even know where to make use of some of this money, a project to Make Amtrak Great Again.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago

Reproductive rights, the right to healthcare, prison reform, within a system that accommodates if not encourages parents in different situations to work and live with children is the best way to support young fathers and boys.

We just need something to call this besides feminism.