60
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

This could be the end of much of the fediverse, especially the more left-leaning parts.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah we need to upvote this one for more general discussion. From what I'm reading if Trump gets his way on this one then the fediverse will essentially be able to be crippled by frivolous lawsuits from anyone who dislikes the speech on the platform and essentially make running it impossible within the US. And of course there's some tech-illiterate grandpas on the Democrats side who fundamentally misunderstand (or willfully and with a stuffed wallet) this legislation and will work with the GOP to end free speech online.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Just makes it that much more important to host instances outside the US, and to conceal your location if you run such a website from within the US. I'd say I can't believe they'd be this stupid, but I'm coming to believe a lot of uncomfortable truths lately.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Call your senators and tell them to vote no

https://www.senate.gov/senators/senators-contact.htm

(if dems, also tell them to push for replacing minority senate leadership)

Call your house reps and tell them to vote no

https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative


Make them feel the pressure keep building. Calls are just step one to build that pressure, protests in person, etc.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

Frankly, we need an alternative to DNS that isn't vulnerable to this kind of censorship.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

It exists - it's called ENS (Ethereum Name Service). All domain names and associated data (like adresses) are stored in the blockchain and accessed through P2P network (Think Torrent-like) with strong cryptographic security.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Well, at least it's set for 1/1/2027. By then, free speech will be long gone anyways or we'll have gotten our act together

I'm sick of this constant fight to stay in place. Fuck the Democrats, we need a party that will do more then slowly cowtow to the fascists

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

Democrats will still claim their party is the lesser evil and not incremental fascism.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Slow fascism vs slightly faster fascism.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

There's only one speed of fascism, the Democrat ratchet effect keeps it at a constant speed.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Which brings us back to the core question: how could these Democratic Senators support a plan that would simultaneously give Donald Trump unprecedented censorship powers while also consolidating Meta’s control over online speech?

The evidence suggests they simply don’t understand what they’re doing. Each of these Senators has a documented history of fundamental confusion about Section 230 and how the internet works:

Richard Blumenthal has been getting Section 230 wrong since his days as Connecticut’s AG in the early 2000s.

Sheldon Whitehouse’s chapter on free speech revealed such profound confusion about Section 230 that it’s hard to believe he’s actually read the law.

We’ve already covered Durbin and Klobuchar’s dangerous misunderstandings.

I'm sure glad they're the representatives standing up for democracy haha right guys?

this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
60 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10523 readers
161 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS