this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2025
1903 points (99.4% liked)

Work Reform

11252 readers
745 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 day ago

This is what Swedish unions did even more directly. A company hired labour from Latvia I think it was. The union showed up and said that thats all fine, but you have to pay them properly. None of them were members. They picketed the company for the sake of non-members wages. Why? To avoid social dumping down the line.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Rising waters lifts all ships", Cathy. Ever heard of it?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 day ago

This doesn't even need to be in your contract. When union shops get a raise, non-union shops either have to compete, or lose their best labour.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Net income is a small factor. One should compare the total package because the unions are usually way ahead of the non-union.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›