43
yt-dlp CLI vs. yt-dlp GUI (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

On Windows 11, is it superior to use the command line interface (e.g., terminal) for interacting with yt-dlp? Or is a GUI like stacher.io sufficient for 99% of needs?

I'm also curious if it is better to use an Ubuntu WSL for yt-dlp CLI for a more streamlined terminal

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

I never felt the need to use a GUI for it, it's very easy to use.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I used to, as I wasn't comfortable with CLI.

Then yeah I realized how easy it was to use lmao, CLI all day now.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

For the most common scenarios I personally find CLI very easy to use: I go to the destination folder, right-click "Open in Terminal" and then type yt-dlp linkcopypastedhere. That's all, multiple sites I used it with didn't require any extra params. Maybe if you want to customize something, like make your own file naming convention, etc, GUI could be handy.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

Maybe if you want to customize something, like make your own file naming convention, etc, GUI could be handy.

Even then, it's probably worth learning the CLI commands and setting up a config file with any desired settings. Once that's setup, you're back to yt-dlp url again.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

do you use a WSL or powershell? windows terminal is inferior to linux terminal imo

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago

I use PowerShell for damn near everything. But I'm pretty sure when you're just typing yt-dlp, space, then pasting the url, then any terminal is as good as any other.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

good point, i did not know that you could change the configuration file instead of adding all the -cookies and -mp3 tags to the yt-dlp url ... command

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

windows terminal is inferior

Note that there is an application called Windows Terminal and that's a terminal, not a shell. You can run any shell in it (including alternative or WSL shells).

I primarily use native Nushell via Windows Terminal.

You're not stuck with PowerShell or batch on Windows.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Until you pointed this out I never realized that windows terminal and command prompt are entirely different applications lol

[-] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

wait, there's GUIs available for yt-dlp??

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Multiple, though yt-dlg hasn't been updated for years.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

i have Total Commander open anyway and have a button on the button bar pointing to the yt-dlp.exe with the parameters below, the "?" makes it do a popup and I just insert the link at the end, it will create a new directory where you are located.

?--config-locations "locationofmy\yt-dlp.config" --output "%P%%(extractor_key)s/%%(uploader)s/%%(title)s-%%(id)s.%%(ext)s"

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

sorry to comment off-topic. But why would you use total commander? I know of maybe two people who use it and I don't understand why. The UI is very outdated, the function keys are hard to press, and it forces two windows. I'm genuinely asking what are it's upsides that anyone would choose to use it?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It has a superset of features compared to the Explorer - Meaning it can do all the things that the explorer can do plus more.

I'm simply used to the two window layout since the old ages of Norton Commander ( Yes, Norton used to create useful products back then.). For me it is about hotkeys for functions ( Select, Filter, Copy, paste, move, delete). A multi rename tool. A search for file contents. A copy queue.

I do not use it for everything, but sometimes it's simply better than the standard windows tools.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

This, I also come from the dos era, i'm accustomed to the split window. This was the "main look" of my PC before windows.

Similarly I cannot understand people who use explorer or anything to manage files, tc makes it so easy.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

the cli is very simple to use as @hisao mentioned here, for any specific options I find that llms like Claude are very helpful for giving me the commands I need. "a yt-dlp command to download 720p with no audio" for example will give you the correct command to paste in

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I'd say the CLI is perfectly fine, I have a config in the same folder so all I have to do is input the URL. I just switch between output directories for episode vs playlist by '#' commenting out the other.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I use yt-dlp in the linux command line environment to download a playlist of thousands of videos of retro video game music. I can have it download the audio, convert to mp3, and only process the stuff that I haven't downloaded (if I update the playlist and add new stuff). It's very powerful.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

do you use a WSL? do u think it would be fine doing it in windows command line like terminal or powershell?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

If you have more experience with Linux CLI over powershell, I'd go with that. There are a few options: WSL2, MSYS2, Cygwin.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

FWIW I use the tartube gui in windows as it'll dl full playlists, even monitor channels and update with new released episodes.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

To make the CLI even easier, just set up an alias in you bashrc file for it. I made it so I just need to type "yt" instead of "yt-dlp". Small change, but helpful imo.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Stacher is pretty handy. I don't think there are any drawbacks.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Up to your preference. I do suggest making an alias for it so it automatically downloads to a specific directory.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I find that preparing config files for each type of media is mighty useful for sustained use of the cli program. This makes it so that downloads all get specced identically. Then you prepare batch/bash scripts or aliases that point to those config files and place them in one of the paths in the environment variable %path% / ${PATH}. then you just call that batch file with the URLs you want to download.

this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2025
43 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

61614 readers
315 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS