Not because DDG got better, but just because google got worse.

google is still better for site-specific searches, and google scholar still has minimal AI slop

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 41 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    I’ve been using DDG exclusively for something like 8 years. It works great for regular text search and I use bing for image searches. I really don’t understand the reluctance of people to switch to it. To me, Google has been borderline unusable garbage for a long time.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Cherry on the shit sundae was a couple months ago when Google started to require JavaScript be enabled for search.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    "just as good"? No, I feel it is (and has been for years) vastly superior but I mostly use it to find documentation or Stack Overflow answers so consistent UI and concise summaries are high priority to me. Take that as you will

    I don't think anybody can dethrone Google Maps yet but that's another story

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    My thought always was that DDG was good to set as my default, and if I'm not happy with the results then it's not a big deal to use Google once in awhile.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [+] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 19 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Duckduckgo mostly uses Bing for its search results. It also uses yahoo, yandex, and it's own crawler, but for the most part you're getting Bing.

    So what you really want to know is if Bing is just as good as Google. If you think it is, you should definitely use ddg because they're the least intrusive.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

    ...........Oh, sorry.

    Hell no. If anything, it's gotten worse.

    In their defense, however, it's probably largely not their fault. In my admittedly one-person-sample-size experience, 90% of the searchable Web is either Reddit threads or articles, and with Reddit going officially with Google (meaning DDG doesn't catch as many Reddit threads as they used to), that leaves most of the searchable Web being articles. Because SEO has to ruin everything.

    So, it's not really that DDG is shitty (mostly), but that all searches are shitty. Though, with the whole Google-and-Reddit thing, I find Google's results are noticeably less shitty (though still shitty).

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    i switched from DDG to ecosia because of Lemmy and i gotta say it's even better

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 16 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    DDG does the job. Hopefully, I won't have to switch engines soon.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    isn't it just a bing wrapper?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    DuckDuckGo AKA Bing is complete dog doo. When you are looking for news it only tries to shove in the Microsoft MSN news page. The algorithm manipulation in favor of Western MSM bias is even heavier than Google. When you search certain terms it refuses to show articles containing those exact terms.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    I just realized the other day that I haven't typed !g in months.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Don't you mean DuckDuckBing ?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)
  • load more comments (17 replies)
    [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Google is mostly adverts. Wouldn’t take much to be better than that.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    It’s just as good as 2008 google, which is all I want.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I really tried, I set duckduckgo as the default for my second browser (I use it a lot) to slowly get used to it, but every time results are so bad I get mad and switch to Google especially for images

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    I can turn off the horseshit firehose that we call AI, making it far better than google

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    So far its still less bloated

  • source
  • [+] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [+] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I find it's actually better at this point because it just gives results without AI summaries and ads, also I find it's just straight up better at actually finding what you're looking for

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Eyeing the replies, does not one other person here get results constantly flooded with content farms? They've gotten significantly worse

    But then, I don't use Google so maybe this is still better than Google Search?

    It started maybe three years ago, around the same time as LLMs became usable for this, but I'm pretty sure >50% are human-written still. Probably the LLM generates the structure (saves any time they'd have to spend coming up with plausible-sounding texts) and someone from a low-income country is contracted to make it look more legit

    Of course, queries for topics that have a Wikipedia page get Wikipedia first, recipes get tons of big-name recipe sites, products get stores. But when there's no obvious market around a topic, 3~4 out of 5 results are content farms pretending to have useful information to show unwary visitors ads

    (As an alternative, I still have to try Kagi properly. It seemed on par with DDG when I did a few searches last year, but then their payment processor refused me trying to load my account, support was unhelpful, and I've gotten sidetracked since)

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    100%. I have not used google in about roughly 15 years. DDG has been my daily driver since 2010

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I do not think so in my experience. I'm a software developer and a lot of my job is searching solutions to problems. Every year or two I'll try DDG because I love the concept but it never works as well for me. Putting the same search query into Google yeilds actual results for me more often than DDG does.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I found Qwant to be a bit better, but yeah. Google got so much worse over last few years

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    No. DDG still puts less priority in small blogs over Reddit posts. All bigger search engines put way too much stock & rank in corpo social media.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    Good enough for me, although there are times I need to use google.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I really agree Google just took themself out of the market. I wouldn't be surprised if they dropped their "search" product completely, the way they've dropped a lot of other good products along the way.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago

    DDG sold out, very focused "bubble" results that they initally railed against.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    I switched to it a couple of years ago, with the expectation that I had to resort to google in more complex search instances. But very soon I found out that ddg did the job, and my "alternative" google searches did not turn up anything better, quite the contrary in fact, and I haven't been back since.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί